ArticleJAMA network open2019
Identification of Factors Associated With Variation in US County-Level Obesity Prevalence Rates Using Epidemiologic vs Machine Learning Models.
Article in JAMA network open, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- A Systematic Review on Applications of Artificial Intelligence for Obesity Prevention.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2026Pooled it
- Modeling obesity in complex food systems: Systematic review.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2022Pooled it
- Dietary Blueberry and Soluble Fiber Supplementation Reduces Risk of Gestational Diabetes in Women with Obesity in a Randomized Controlled Trial.The Journal of nutrition · 2021Trial
- Article
- Transforming Obesity Care With Digital Therapeutics: Mobile Health Apps, Clinical Evidence, and Regulatory Considerations.Journal of obesity · 2026Review
- Interpretable Prediction of Myocardial Infarction Using Explainable Boosting Machines: A Biomarker-Based Machine Learning Approach.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- Place effects on adult obesity and cardiometabolic health: Evidence from a natural experiment.Health & place · 2025Article
- Harnessing Artificial Intelligence in Obesity Research and Management: A Comprehensive Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Environmental factors affecting the BMI of older adults in the Philippines spatially assessed using machine learning.Heliyon · 2025Article
- Reliable prediction of childhood obesity using only routinely collected EHRs may be possible.Obesity pillars · 2024Article
- Computational algorithm based on health and lifestyle traits to categorize lifemetabotypes in the NUTRiMDEA cohort.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Combination of Machine Learning Techniques to Predict Overweight/Obesity in Adults.Journal of personalized medicine · 2024Article
- County-level socio-environmental factors and obesity prevalence in the United States.Diabetes, obesity & metabolism · 2024Article
- Identifying Young Adults at High Risk for Weight Gain Using Machine Learning.The Journal of surgical research · 2023Article
- Article
- Predicting Overweight and Obesity Status Among Malaysian Working Adults With Machine Learning or Logistic Regression: Retrospective Comparison Study.JMIR formative research · 2022Article
- Applications of Artificial Intelligence to Obesity Research: Scoping Review of Methodologies.Journal of medical Internet research · 2022Article
- Place-based heterogeneity in lung transplant recipient outcomes.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2022Article
- Article
- Forecasting the rate of hand injuries in Singapore.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Obesity is a leading cause of high health care expenditures, disability, and premature mortality. Previous studies have documented geographic disparities in obesity prevalence. Objective: To identify county-level factors associated with obesity using traditional epidemiologic and machine learning methods. Design, Setting, and Participants: Cross-sectional study using linear regression models and machine learning models to evaluate the associations between county-level obesity and county-level demographic, socioeconomic, health care, and environmental factors from summarized statistical data extracted from the 2018 Robert Wood Johnson Foundation County Health Rankings and merged with US Census data from each of 3138 US counties. The explanatory power of the linear multivariate regression and the top performing machine learning model were compared using mean R2 measured in 30-fold cross validation. Exposures: County-level demographic factors (population; rural status; census region; and race/ethnicity, sex, and age composition), socioeconomic factors (median income, unemployment rate, and percentage of population with some college education), health care factors (rate of uninsured adults and primary care physicians), and environmental factors (access to healthy foods and access to exercise opportunities). Main Outcomes and Measures: County-level obesity prevalence in 2018, its association with each county-level factor, and the percentage of variation in county-level obesity prevalence explained by linear multivariate and gradient boosting machine regression measured with R2. Results: Among the 3138 counties studied, the mean (range) obesity prevalence was 31.5% (12.8%-47.8%). In multivariate regressions, demographic factors explained 44.9% of variation in obesity prevalence; socioeconomic factors, 33.0%; environmental factors, 15.5%; and health care factors, 9.1%. The county-level factors with the strongest association with obesity were census region, median household income, and percentage of population with some college education. R2 values of univariate regressions of obesity prevalence were 0.238 for census region, 0.218 for median household income, and 0.160 for percentage of population with some college education. Multivariate linear regression and gradient boosting machine regression (the best-performing machine learning model) of obesity prevalence using all county-level demographic, socioeconomic, health care, and environmental factors had R2 values of 0.58 and 0.66, respectively (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Obesity prevalence varies significantly between counties. County-level demographic, socioeconomic, health care, and environmental factors explain the majority of variation in county-level obesity prevalence. Using machine learning models may explain significantly more of the variation in obesity prevalence..
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.