Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31025916›Full record

ArticleCBE life sciences education2019

Opportunities for Self-Evaluation Increase Student Calibration in an Introductory Biology Course.

Jennifer L Osterhage, Ellen L Usher, Trisha A Douin, William M Bailey

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in CBE life sciences education, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Systematic review of distributed practice and retrieval practice in health professions education.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jennifer L OsterhageDepartment of Biology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506.
Ellen L UsherDepartment of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506.
Trisha A DouinDepartment of Educational, School, and Counseling Psychology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506.
William M BaileyDepartment of Physiology, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY 40506.

Funding

Howard Hughes Medical Institute 52008116
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate self-evaluation is critical for learning. Calibration describes the relationship between learners' perception of their performance and their actual performance on a task. Here, we describe two studies aimed at assessing and improving student calibration in a first-semester introductory biology course at a 4-year public institution. Study 1 investigated students' (

Indexed as

Self-AssessmentBiologyCalibrationEducational MeasurementFemaleHumansLearningMaleStudentsTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID31025916
PMCPMC6755215

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.