Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31025305›Full record

Observational studyJournal of general internal medicine2019

Association of Patient Social, Cognitive, and Functional Risk Factors with Preventable Hospitalizations: Implications for Physician Value-Based Payment.

Kenton J Johnston, Hefei Wen, Mario Schootman, Karen E Joynt Maddox

Open access · bronzeAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Journal of general internal medicine, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
12.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Functional Impairments, Phenotypic Frailty, and Sector-Specific Incremental Healthcare Costs in Older Adults.The journals of gerontology. Series A, Biological sciences and medical sciences · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Observational
  13. Observational
  14. Observational
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Kenton J JohnstonDepartment of Health Management and Policy and Center for Outcomes Research, College for Public Health and Social Justice, Saint Louis University, St. Louis, MO, USA. johnstonkj@slu.edu.
Hefei WenDepartment of Health Management and Policy, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, USA.
Mario SchootmanDepartment of Clinical Analytics and Insights, Center for Clinical Excellence, SSM Health, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Karen E Joynt MaddoxCardiovascular Division, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Saint Louis University · USSSM Health Care · USUniversity of Kentucky · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

THE IMPACT OF PUBLIC REPORTING ON OUTCOMES AND CASE SELECTION FOR PCIK23HL109177 · NHLBI · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI JOYNT MADDOX, KAREN ELLEN · 2011 to 2017
$691k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL109177
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbulatory care-sensitive condition (ACSC) hospitalizations are used to evaluate physicians' performance in Medicare value-based payment programs. However, these measures may disadvantage physicians caring for vulnerable populations because they omit social, cognitive, and functional factors that may be important determinants of hospitalization.

objectiveTo determine whether social, cognitive, and functional risk factors are associated with ACSC hospitalization rates and whether adjusting for them changes outpatient safety-net providers' performance.

designUsing data from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey, we conducted patient-level multivariable regression to estimate the association (as incidence rate ratios (IRRs)) between patient-reported social, cognitive, and functional risk factors and ACSC hospitalizations. We compared outpatient safety-net and non-safety-net providers' performance after adjusting for clinical comorbidities alone and after additional adjustment for social, cognitive, and functional factors captured in survey data.

settingSafety-net and non-safety-net clinics.

participantsCommunity-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries contributing 38,616 person-years from 2006 to 2013. MEASUREMENTS: Acute and chronic ACSC hospitalizations.

resultsAfter adjusting for clinical comorbidities, Alzheimer's/dementia (IRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.02-1.65), difficulty with 3-6 activities of daily living (ADLs) (IRR 1.43, 95% CI 1.05-1.94), difficulty with 1-2 instrumental ADLs (IADLs, IRR 1.54, 95% CI 1.26-1.90), and 3-6 IADLs (IRR 1.90, 95% CI 1.49-2.43) were associated with acute ACSC hospitalization. Low income (IRR 1.28, 95% CI 1.03-1.58), lack of educational attainment (IRR 1.33, 95% CI 1.04-1.69), being unmarried (IRR 1.18, 95% CI 1.01-1.36), difficulty with 1-2 IADLs (IRR 1.30, 95% CI 1.05-1.60), and 3-6 IADLs (IRR 1.44, 95% CI 1.16-1.80) were associated with chronic ACSC hospitalization. Adding these factors to standard Medicare risk adjustment eliminated outpatient safety-net providers' performance gap (p < .05) on ACSC hospitalization rates relative to non-safety-net providers.

conclusionsSocial, cognitive, and functional risk factors are independently associated with ACSC hospitalizations. Failure to account for them may penalize outpatient safety-net providers for factors that are beyond their control.

Indexed as

Acute DiseaseAgedAmbulatory CareChronic DiseaseFemaleHospitalizationHumansMaleMedicarePrevalenceRetrospective StudiesRisk FactorsSafety-net ProvidersUnited StatesValue-Based Health InsuranceMedicarephysician value-based paymentsafety-net providers

Identifiers

PMID31025305
PMCPMC6667509
OpenAlexW2942339449

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.