Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31025293›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2019

Sliding Window Adduct Removal Method (SWARM) for Enhanced Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Binding Data.

Pavel I Kitov, Ling Han, Elena N Kitova, John S Klassen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Pavel I KitovAlberta Glycomics Centre and Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G2, Canada.
Ling HanAlberta Glycomics Centre and Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G2, Canada.
Elena N KitovaAlberta Glycomics Centre and Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G2, Canada.
John S KlassenAlberta Glycomics Centre and Department of Chemistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, T6G 2G2, Canada. john.klassen@ualberta.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3389-7112

Funding

Alberta Innovates Alberta Glycomics CentreCanada Foundation for Innovation 33097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) screening of compound libraries against target proteins enables the rapid identification of ligands and measurement of the stoichiometry and affinity of the interactions. However, non-specific association of buffer or salts (added or present as impurities) to the protein ions during gas-phase ion formation can complicate the analysis of ESI-MS data acquired for mixtures of compounds with similar molecular weights. Spectral overlap of ions corresponding to free protein and protein-ligand complexes and their corresponding adducts can hinder the identification of ligands and introduce errors in the measured affinities. Here, we present a straightforward approach, called the sliding window adduct removal method (SWARM), to quantitatively correct ESI mass spectra of low-to-moderate resolution for signal overlap associated with adducts. The method relies on the statistical nature of adduct formation in ESI and the assumption that the distributions of adducts associated with a given protein (free protein and ligand-bound forms) are identical at a given charge state. Analysis of ESI mass spectra measured for protein-oligosaccharide interactions using solutions that produced either low- or high-abundance adducts provides support for this assumption. Implementation of SWARM involves the stepwise subtraction of the adduct signal associated with the detected protein-ligand complexes from the mass spectrum. This is accomplished using the adduct distribution measured for an appropriate reference species (usually free protein). To demonstrate the utility of the method, we applied SWARM to ESI-MS screening data acquired for libraries of oligosaccharides and bifunctional ligands consisting of a sulfonamide moiety linked to human glycan structures. Graphical Abstract.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsAnimalsCarbonic Anhydrase IChickensGalectin 3HumansLigandsMuramidaseOligosaccharidesProtein BindingProteinsSpectrometry, Mass, Electrospray IonizationCarbonic Anhydrase IGalectin 3LigandsMuramidaseOligosaccharidesProteinsAdductsAffinityElectrospray ionization mass spectrometryLibrary screening

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.