ArticleJournal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry2019
Sliding Window Adduct Removal Method (SWARM) for Enhanced Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry Binding Data.
Article in Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Glycolipid recognition and binding by Siglec-6 hinges on interactions with the cell membrane.Communications biology · 2026Article
- Synthesis of 4-azido sialic acid for testing against Siglec-7 and in metabolic oligosaccharide engineering.RSC chemical biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Structure of the AlgKX modification and secretion complex required for alginate production and biofilm attachment in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.Nature communications · 2022Article
- Quantifying Biomolecular Interactions Using Slow Mixing Mode (SLOMO) Nanoflow ESI-MS.ACS central science · 2022Article
- Approaches to Heterogeneity in Native Mass Spectrometry.Chemical reviews · 2022Review
- Sialic acid-containing glycolipids mediate binding and viral entry of SARS-CoV-2.Nature chemical biology · 2022Article
- Quantifying Carbohydrate-Active Enzyme Activity with Glycoprotein Substrates Using Electrospray Ionization Mass Spectrometry and Center-of-Mass Monitoring.Analytical chemistry · 2021Article
- Native Mass Spectrometry Reveals the Simultaneous Binding of Lipids and Zinc to Rhodopsin.International journal of mass spectrometry · 2021Article
- Distinct classes of multi-subunit heterogeneity: analysis using Fourier Transform methods and native mass spectrometry.The Analyst · 2020Article
- A quantitative, high-throughput method identifies protein-glycan interactions via mass spectrometry.Communications biology · 2019Article
- Quantifying Protein-Glycan Interactions Using Native Mass Spectrometry.Mass spectrometry reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) screening of compound libraries against target proteins enables the rapid identification of ligands and measurement of the stoichiometry and affinity of the interactions. However, non-specific association of buffer or salts (added or present as impurities) to the protein ions during gas-phase ion formation can complicate the analysis of ESI-MS data acquired for mixtures of compounds with similar molecular weights. Spectral overlap of ions corresponding to free protein and protein-ligand complexes and their corresponding adducts can hinder the identification of ligands and introduce errors in the measured affinities. Here, we present a straightforward approach, called the sliding window adduct removal method (SWARM), to quantitatively correct ESI mass spectra of low-to-moderate resolution for signal overlap associated with adducts. The method relies on the statistical nature of adduct formation in ESI and the assumption that the distributions of adducts associated with a given protein (free protein and ligand-bound forms) are identical at a given charge state. Analysis of ESI mass spectra measured for protein-oligosaccharide interactions using solutions that produced either low- or high-abundance adducts provides support for this assumption. Implementation of SWARM involves the stepwise subtraction of the adduct signal associated with the detected protein-ligand complexes from the mass spectrum. This is accomplished using the adduct distribution measured for an appropriate reference species (usually free protein). To demonstrate the utility of the method, we applied SWARM to ESI-MS screening data acquired for libraries of oligosaccharides and bifunctional ligands consisting of a sulfonamide moiety linked to human glycan structures. Graphical Abstract.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31025293What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.