ArticlePituitary2019
Assessment of static and dynamic plantar data of patients with acromegaly.
Article in Pituitary, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- Static and Dynamic Balance Is Impaired in Patients With Long-Term, Well-Controlled Acromegaly: A Cross-Sectional Study.Clinical endocrinology · 2025Article
- Pedobarographic evaluations in physical medicine and rehabilitation practice.Turkish journal of physical medicine and rehabilitation · 2023Review
- Neuropathic foot ulcers in the tallest patients with acromegalic gigantism: a common and significant problem. Historical overview.Pituitary · 2023Review
- Comparison of Walking Quality Variables between End-Stage Osteonecrosis of Femoral Head Patients and Healthy Subjects by a Footscan Plantar Pressure System.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2022Article
- Pedabarography May Play a Role in Foot Plantar Scanning in Acromegaly.International journal of clinical practice · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo determine both static and dynamic plantar data of acromegalic subjects while barefoot.
methodsSeventy acromegalic patients and 48 age-, sex-, weight- and height-matched healthy controls were included. Plantar variables were measured using the footscan gait system. The data included the width and length of each foot, relative force distribution in each quadrant, mean force applied to each foot and maximum pressure while walking. Maximum pressure data were obtained from ten parts of the foot. Injury risk assessments of five different regions were performed. To analyze balance, center of pressure (CoP) measurements were performed. The patients with acromegaly were compared with the controls. Furthermore, a comparison of patients with active and controlled acromegaly was performed.
resultsThe foot was wider in acromegalic patients. The mean force on each foot was higher in cases of acromegaly (acromegaly: 1027 ± 180 N, control: 908 ± 180 N, p = 0.001). In the acromegalic individuals, the maximum pressure in the midfoot was higher, while the medial heel maximum pressure was lower (midfoot maximum pressure acromegaly: 11.3 ± 3.5 N/cm
conclusionsThis is the first study to demonstrate that compared with healthy controls, patients with acromegaly experience great force on their feet while standing and high pressure in the midfoot during walking. Podiatric evaluation, custom molded orthotics and individualized rehabilitation programs for acromegalic patients may provide better force and pressure distribution throughout the foot and improve gait and skeletal symptoms.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.