Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31025165›Full record

ArticleLangenbeck's archives of surgery2019

Synchronous liver metastases and peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal cancer: different strategies for curative treatment?

Amandine Pinto, Christian Hobeika, Antoine Philis, Sylvain Kirzin, Nicolas Carrère, Laurent Ghouti

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Langenbeck's archives of surgery, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Amandine PintoDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU de Toulouse (University Hospital Centre), Paul Sabatier Toulouse III University, Place du Dr Baylac, 31059, Toulouse, France.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4291-6714
Christian HobeikaUnité Inserm, Paris 7, CAP Paris Tech U1275, hôpital Lariboisière, Paris Diderot University, Sorbonne Paris Cité, 2, rue Ambroise-Paré, 75010, Paris, France.
Antoine PhilisDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU de Toulouse (University Hospital Centre), Paul Sabatier Toulouse III University, Place du Dr Baylac, 31059, Toulouse, France.
Sylvain KirzinDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU de Toulouse (University Hospital Centre), Paul Sabatier Toulouse III University, Place du Dr Baylac, 31059, Toulouse, France.
Nicolas CarrèreDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU de Toulouse (University Hospital Centre), Paul Sabatier Toulouse III University, Place du Dr Baylac, 31059, Toulouse, France.
Laurent GhoutiDepartment of General and Digestive Surgery, Purpan Hospital, CHU de Toulouse (University Hospital Centre), Paul Sabatier Toulouse III University, Place du Dr Baylac, 31059, Toulouse, France. ghouti.l@chu-toulouse.fr.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundManagement of patients with resectable hepatic metastases (HMs) and colorectal peritoneal carcinomatosis (CRPC) is not currently standardised.

objectiveThe aims of this study were to evaluate the safety of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) and hepatic surgery for patients with CRPC with synchronous hepatic metastases (HM), and its impact on survival rates.

methodsA retrospective analysis was performed, including patients undergoing CRS/HIPEC for CRPC from 2007 to September 2016 in two groups, with (HM+) and without (HM-) synchronous hepatic metastases. Patients with extra-abdominal metastases were excluded. The hepatic strategy was described. Morbimortality and survival were compared between the two groups.

resultsOne hundred nine patients underwent CRS/HIPEC for CRPC with or without hepatic surgery with curative intent: 33 patients with (HM+) and 76 patients without (HM-) synchronous HM. The median follow-up was 30 months. All patients with HM (HM+) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy vs. 88.1% in the HM- group (p = 0.04) associated with monoclonal antibody in 66.6% of cases in the HM+ group vs. 57% in the HM- group (p = 0.01). In the HM+ group, two steps were implemented to treat peritoneal and hepatic metastases in 15 patients (45%). In this group, planned hepatic resection in two procedures was performed for eight patients, all presenting bilobar HM. Postoperative morbidity did not differ between the two groups. No deaths occurred. Median overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were 31 and 65 months (p = 0.188), versus 21 and 24 months (p = 0.119), respectively, in the HM+ versus HM- groups. In multivariate analysis, the peritoneal cancer index (PCI) was the only significant prognostic factor whereas synchronous HM was not a significant prognostic factor.

conclusionCurative surgical treatment for CRPC with synchronous HM seems to be feasible and safe, and could facilitate long survival rates, compared to patients without HM. The hepatic strategy is not standardised. However, a "two-step" surgical strategy could be proposed in order to reduce postoperative morbidity rates.

Indexed as

Cytoreduction Surgical ProceduresAgedChemotherapy, AdjuvantColorectal NeoplasmsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleHumansHyperthermia, InducedLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoadjuvant TherapyPeritoneal NeoplasmsRetrospective StudiesSurvival RateColorectal cancerHIPECLiver metastasesPeritoneal metastases

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.