ArticleThe Psychiatric quarterly2019
Commentary on "Predictors of Seclusion or Restraint Use Within Residential Treatment Centers for Children and Adolescents" by Green-Hennessy and Hennessy.
Article in The Psychiatric quarterly, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- National Seclusion and Restraint Trends within Child Residential Treatment Facilities: 2010-2020 in Review.The Psychiatric quarterly · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In their 2015 study, Sharon Green-Hennessy and Kevin D. Hennessy addressed an important gap in the literature on seclusion and restraint use in child and adolescent residential treatment centers (RTCs). Their analysis revealed that several facility-level characteristics-such as facility size and ownership-predicted the use of seclusion/restraint in child/adolescent RTCs. The authors also examined patient demographic variables that were significant predictors of seclusion/restraint in prior research on individual patients within facilities. However, Green-Hennessy and Hennessy did not find any relationship between these demographic variables and seclusion/restraint. In this commentary I argue that the null relationship between patient demographics and seclusion/restraint was a result of an ecological fallacy. Rather than attempting to use aggregate patient data to infer individual-level processes, this patient data should be used to study aggregate effects. I demonstrate that by re-conceptualizing these patient demographics as indicative of facility characteristics, rather than patient characteristics, new information can be gleaned about the types of facilities that use seclusion/restraint. The arguments presented here have broader implications for future research in this field that relies on aggregate patient data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.