ArticleRheumatology international2019
A bibliometric analysis of the global research in ankylosing spondyloarthritis (2008-2017).
Article in Rheumatology international, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Global research trends on fibromyalgia and exercise: a ten-year Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2025Article
- Stem cell transplantation in cerebrovascular accidents: A global bibliometric analysis (2000-2023).World journal of stem cells · 2024Article
- Bibliometric analysis of global literature productivity in systemic lupus erythematosus from 2013 to 2022.Clinical rheumatology · 2024Article
- Rheumatic diseases and gut microbiota publications in 2002-2022: a Scopus‑based bibliometric analysis.Rheumatology international · 2023Article
- Bibliometric and altmetric analyses of publication activity in the field of idiopathic inflammatory myopathy in 2011-2021 based on web of science core collection databases.Rheumatology international · 2023Article
- Bibliometric and altmetric analysis of research relating to antiphospholipid syndrome based on VOS viewer (2011-2021).Clinical rheumatology · 2023Article
- Bibliometric analysis of the global literature productivity of adult-onset Still's disease (2011-2020).Rheumatology international · 2022Article
- Highly cited papers in Takayasu arteritis on Web of Science and Scopus: cross-sectional analysis.Clinical rheumatology · 2022Article
- Ankylosing spondylitis rehabilitation publications and the global productivity: a Web of Science-based bibliometric analysis (2000-2019).Rheumatology international · 2021Article
- Bibliometric analysis of publication activity in the field of familial Mediterranean fever in 2010-2019: a Scopus-based study.Rheumatology international · 2021Article
- Bibliometric and Altmetric Analyses of Publication Activity in the Field of Behcet's Disease in 2010-2019.Journal of Korean medical science · 2021Article
- Publication activity in the field of Sjögren's syndrome: a ten-year Web of Science based analysis.Rheumatology international · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The current study was to investigate the quantity and quality of researches in the field of ankylosing spondylitis, and to reveal the characteristics of worldwide productivity on this disease. This was a bibliometric study on ankylosing spondylitis using Web of Science. The numbers of papers, citations, research output normalized by population and gross domestic product, and the main active countries were analyzed. A total number of 7239 papers were published between 2008 and 2017. The yearly number of papers published during this period showed a significant increase (p < 0.001). North America, West Europe and East Asia were the main regions for AS papers. High-income countries contributed the greatest proportion of papers (70.49%). The research productivity from middle- and low-income countries was low (29.45%; 0.06%). The United States was the country with the greatest contributions between 2008 and 2017 (12.47%), followed by China (12.17%), Turkey (8.34%), Germany (7.82%), and the United Kingdom (5.97%). Significantly positive correlations were proved between the number of papers and population/gross domestic product (p < 0.05). From 2013, the number of AS publications by the authors from China exceeded those from the United States. However, China had far less total citations (7219 vs. 22,043) and average citations (8.19 vs. 24.41) than the United States. Denmark had the greatest productivity when normalized by population, followed by Norway, and Netherlands. When normalized by gross domestic product, Denmark led the top list, followed by Netherlands, and Greece. Papers from Australia showed the highest average citation (32.64), followed by Netherlands (31.63), and Germany (26.88). The current study showed a noticeable growth in global research output on ankylosing spondylitis between 2008 and 2017. High-income countries especially the United States had the greatest contributions. The contributions from middle- and low-income countries were considerably small. The number of papers published by countries was positively associated with their population and gross domestic product. Although China had exceeded the United States in the quantity of yearly AS publications, the quality of papers from China was lower compared to the United States. European countries may have better performance relative to their population and economic size.
Indexed as
Identifiers
31025140What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.