Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31025134›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology2019

Detection of Fusobacterium nucleatum in stool and colonic tissues from Norwegian colorectal cancer patients.

Hege Smith Tunsjø, Gro Gundersen, Fredrik Rangnes, John Christopher Noone, Alexander Endres, Vahid Bemanian

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 34 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 56 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Microbiota in cancer: current understandings and future perspectives.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Frontiers in immunology · 2025
    Article
  9. Association ofGut microbiome (Cambridge, England) · 2025
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Potential and application ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  13. Investigation of the relationship betweenFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  14. Potential Pathogens Associated with Colorectal Cancer.Current pharmaceutical biotechnology · 2025
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Effect of Chemotherapy onIndian journal of microbiology · 2024
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Application ofWorld journal of gastrointestinal oncology · 2024
    Article
  19. Article
  20. World journal of gastroenterology · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.

Hege Smith TunsjøDepartment of Life Sciences and Health, Oslo Metropolitan University, Oslo, Norway. hetu@oslomet.no.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1114-0717
Gro GundersenDepartment of Multidisciplinary Laboratory Science and Medical Biochemistry, Genetic Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Fredrik RangnesDepartment of Multidisciplinary Laboratory Science and Medical Biochemistry, Genetic Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
John Christopher NooneDepartment of Microbiology and Infection Control, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Alexander EndresDepartment of Gastroenterology, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Vahid BemanianDepartment of Multidisciplinary Laboratory Science and Medical Biochemistry, Genetic Unit, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway.
Akershus University Hospital · NOOsloMet – Oslo Metropolitan University · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Norway has one of the world's highest incidences of colorectal cancer (CRC). Accumulating research suggests that the intestinal microbiota may have an important role in initiation and progression of colorectal cancer. In order to evaluate microbiome-based biomarkers for non-invasive detection of CRC, the levels of Fusobacterium nucleatum and selected Escherichia coli toxin genes in stool and mucosa from a small cohort of Norwegian patients were investigated. The study cohort included 72 patients scheduled for colonoscopy. The patients were divided into three groups upon their examinations: cancer, polyp, and control groups. Levels of F. nucleatum in stool samples were significantly higher in the cancer group compared with the control group and the polyp group. High levels of F. nucleatum in stool reflected detection of F. nucleatum in the tumor tissues of colorectal cancer patients. However, no difference in the levels of E. coli toxin genes in neither stool nor biopsy samples between the patient groups was observed. This study suggests that a quantitative PCR assay targeting F. nucleatum in stool samples has the potential to be included in a larger panel of biomarkers for non-invasive testing for colorectal cancer.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorBiopsyCohort StudiesColonColonoscopyColorectal NeoplasmsEarly Detection of CancerEscherichia coliFecesFemaleFusobacterium InfectionsFusobacterium nucleatumGastrointestinal MicrobiomeHumansBiomarkers, TumorBiomarkerCRCEarly detectionFusobacterium nucleatumNon-invasiveqPCR

Identifiers

PMID31025134
OpenAlexW2942051269

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.