ArticleWorld journal of urology2020
Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging to identify pseudocapsule invasion in renal tumors.
Article in World journal of urology, 2020. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The association between preoperative pseudocapsule integrity on magnetic resonance imaging and the pathological features of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Abdominal radiology (New York) · 2026Article
- An interpretable contrast-enhanced CT radiomics-based pipeline incorporating automatic segmentation for predicting ISUP grade group in ccRCC.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Impact of tumor size and sex on diagnostic discrepancies in renal mass imaging.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Differential diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma with low signal intensity on T2WI from angiomyolipoma without visible fat on MR imaging.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Article
- Potential of quantitative T1 mapping to serve as a novel prognostic predictor of clear cell renal cell carcinoma after nephrectomy.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024Article
- Preoperative prediction of renal fibrous capsule invasion in clear cell renal cell carcinoma using CT-based radiomics model.The British journal of radiology · 2024Article
- Machine learning-based multiparametric MRI radiomics nomogram for predicting WHO/ISUP nuclear grading of clear cell renal cell carcinoma.Frontiers in oncology · 2024Article
- Is Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging in a Daily Clinical Setting Useful to Evaluate Tumor Invasion Beyond the Pseudocapsule in Renal Cell Carcinoma?Yonago acta medica · 2021Article
- Detection of a peritumoral pseudocapsule in patients with renal cell carcinoma undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy using enhanced MDCT.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- No Detection of Pseudocapsule of Tumor-Parenchyma Interface on Multidetector Computed Tomography (MDCT) Images: Clinical Significance and Histological Reflections in Renal Cell Carcinoma.Cancer management and research · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
16 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo evaluate accuracy of MRI in detecting renal tumor pseudocapsule (PC) invasion and to propose a classification based on imaging of PC status in patients with renal cell carcinoma.
methodsFrom January 2017 to June 2018, 58 consecutive patients with localized renal cell carcinoma were prospectively enrolled. MRI was performed preoperatively and PC was classified, according to its features, as follows: MRI-Cap 0 (absence of PC), MRI-Cap 1 (presence of a clearly identifiable PC), MRI-Cap 2 (focally interrupted PC), and MRI-Cap 3 (clearly interrupted and infiltrated PC). A 3D image reconstruction showing MRI-Cap score was provided to both surgeon and pathologist to obtain complete preoperative evaluation and to compare imaging and pathology reports. All patients underwent laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. In surgical specimens, PC was classified according to the renal tumor capsule invasion scoring system (i-Cap).
resultsA concordance between MRI-Cap and i-Cap was found in 50/58 (86%) cases. ρ coefficient for each MRI-cap and iCap categories was: MRI-Cap 0: 0.89 (p < 0.0001), MRI-Cap1: 0.75 (p < 0.0001), MRI-Cap 2: 0.76 (p < 0.0001), and MRI-Cap3: 0.87 (p < 0.0001). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and AUC were: MRI-Cap 0: Se 97.87% Spec 83.3%, PPV 95.8%, NPV 90.9%, and AUC 90.9; MRI-Cap 1: Se 77% Spec 95.5%, PPV 83.3%, NPV 93.5%, and AUC 0.86; MRI-Cap 2- iCap 2: Se 88% Spec 90%, PPV 79%, NPV 95%, and AUC 0.89; MRI-Cap 3: Se 94% Spec 95%, PPV 88%, NPV 97%, and AUC 0.94.
conclusionsMRI-Cap classification is accurate in evaluating renal tumor PC features. PC features can provide an imaging-guided landmark to figure out where a minimal margin could be preferable during nephron-sparing surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.