ArticleSkeletal radiology2019
Characterization of intramuscular calf vein thrombosis on routine knee MRI.
Article in Skeletal radiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Incidence and characteristic of deep venous thrombosis in hospitalized chronic heart failure patients.Heart and vessels · 2024Article
- Venous thrombosis: a mimic of musculoskeletal injury on MR imaging.Skeletal radiology · 2023Review
- Deep vein thrombosis in the thigh: MR imaging in two cases with atypical presentations.Skeletal radiology · 2022Article
- Isolated distal deep vein thrombosis: Diagnosis and management.Science progressReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveLiterature regarding intramuscular calf vein thrombosis (IMCVT) or infrapopliteal deep vein thrombosis (DVT) evaluation by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is limited, particularly with regard to routine unenhanced knee examinations. We attempt to correlate routine unenhanced MRI findings with ultrasound evaluations of the lower extremity deep venous system. MATERIALS AND
methodsThe radiology information system was searched, yielding a total of 67 patients who had undergone both routine knee MRI and duplex ultrasound examinations within 14 days. The MRI examination findings recorded were the presence and pattern of edema, segmental vein dilation, intraluminal signal on fluid-sensitive sequences, and abnormal hyperintense signal on axial T1-weighted sequences. The presence and extent of thrombus more centrally (i.e., intramuscular calf vein thrombosis with or without extension into the popliteal vein) was reassessed on ultrasound.
resultsWhen comparing patients with positive (n = 13) and negative (n = 54) ultrasound, there were significant differences in each of these parameters: perivascular edema, intramuscular edema, focal vein dilation, and abnormal fluid-sensitive signal. In the subset of patients with popliteal extension of the intramuscular calf vein thrombosis compared with those without any deep vein thrombosis, there was a statistically significant increase in peripopliteal edema, abnormal fluid-sensitive signal, and abnormal hyperintense T1 signal.
conclusionImaging findings on routine unenhanced MRI have a high rate of concordance with duplex ultrasound performed through the calf in the detection of intramuscular calf vein thrombosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.