Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31025042›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2019

[Restructuring of inpatient emergency treatment : What will change?]

J C Brokmann, M Pin, M Bernhard, F Walcher, A Gries

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

J C BrokmannZentrale Notaufnahme, Uniklinik RWTH Aachen, Pauwelsstr. 30, 52074, Aachen, Deutschland. jbrokmann@ukaachen.de.
M PinZentrale Notaufnahme, Florence Nightingale Krankenhaus, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
M BernhardZentrale Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf, Düsseldorf, Deutschland.
F WalcherKlinik für Unfallchirurgie, Universitätsklinikum Magdeburg, Magdeburg, Deutschland.
A GriesZentrale Notaufnahme, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The resolution on the restructuring of inpatient emergency treatment was passed by the Federal Joint Committee (G-BA) on 19 April 2018 based on the Hospital Structure Act and became binding with the publication in the Bundesanzeiger on 18 May 2018. The resolution describes the future structural and qualitative prerequisites for participation of hospitals in the provision of emergency treatment in three levels: basic emergency treatment, extended emergency treatment and comprehensive emergency treatment. Furthermore, a level of nonparticipation is also planned. In addition, there are special modules, e.g. for the treatment of children and auxiliary modules for specifically equipped hospitals with highly specialized patient treatment (e.g. stroke unit). A transition regulation period of 3-5 years provides hospitals with the possibility to adjust to the new minimum requirements. The German Hospital Federation (DKG) and the National Association of Statutory Health Insurance Funds (GKV-SV) will negotiate the assessment of surcharges and deductions subsequent to the resolution.

Indexed as

ChildEmergency Service, HospitalEmergency TreatmentGermanyHospitalizationHumansInpatientsLegislation, HospitalCentral emergency departmentEmergency medical servicesGermanyHealth planningTreatment levels

Identifiers

PMID31025042

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.