Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024971›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2019

Restoration of Bacterial Microbiome Composition and Diversity Among Treatment Responders in a Phase 2 Trial of RBX2660: An Investigational Microbiome Restoration Therapeutic.

Ken F Blount, William D Shannon, Elena Deych, Courtney Jones

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Alternative treatment of recurrentFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Review
  8. Newer Therapeutics to Selectively KillInfectious disease reports · 2026
    Review
  9. Article
  10. The evolving landscape of live biotherapeutics in the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection.Indian journal of gastroenterology : official journal of the Indian Society of Gastroenterology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Gut Microbiota and New Microbiome-Targeted Drugs forAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Microbiota restoration therapies for recurrentTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2024
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ken F BlountRebiotix, Roseville, Minnesota.
William D ShannonBioRankings, St Louis, Missouri.
Elena DeychBioRankings, St Louis, Missouri.
Courtney JonesRebiotix, Roseville, Minnesota.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundRBX2660 is an investigational microbiota restoration therapy in phase 3 clinical development for preventing recurrent

methodsSamples were sequenced using 16S methods, and the resulting relative abundance data were fit to a Dirichlet-multinomial distribution to determine group mean relative taxonomic abundance and overdispersion at the class level. Alpha diversity was determined for all samples. Biostatistical tools, including effect size and repeated-measures analysis, were applied to evaluate the statistical significance of observed changes.

resultsAt study entry, subjects' microbiomes were dominated by Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli, with low abundance of Bacteroidia and Clostridia. After treatment, Bacteroidia, Clostridia, and alpha diversity increased among RBX2660 responders, concomitant with a decrease of Gammaproteobacteria and Bacilli. The resulting compositions differed significantly from baseline compositions, and the changes among RBX2660 responders differed significantly from those in placebo responders, in whom Bacteroidia or Gammaproteobacteria abundance did not change as much. Repeated-measures analyses indicated more rapid and extensive microbiome remodeling among RBX2660 responders compared with placebo responders, and effect size analyses revealed that RBX2660 responders' microbiomes became more similar to the RBX2660 composition, also compared with placebo responders.

conclusionsPrevention of recurrent CDI with RBX2660 was associated with restorative microbiome changes that may help resist

Indexed as

clinical trialClostridioides difficile infectionmicrobiomemicrobiota-based therapyrecurrence

Identifiers

PMID31024971
PMCPMC6475591

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.