Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024904›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2019

Defending Our Public Biological Databases as a Global Critical Infrastructure.

Jacob Caswell, Jason D Gans, Nicholas Generous, Corey M Hudson, Eric Merkley, Curtis Johnson, Christopher Oehmen, Kristin Omberg, Emilie Purvine, Karen Taylor and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Database Commons: A Catalog of Worldwide Biological Databases.Genomics, proteomics & bioinformatics · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Jacob CaswellSandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Jason D GansLos Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, NM, United States.
Nicholas GenerousLos Alamos National Laboratory, Global Security Directorate, Los Alamos, NM, United States.
Corey M HudsonSandia National Laboratories, Livermore, CA, United States.
Eric MerkleyPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States.
Curtis JohnsonSandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Christopher OehmenPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States.
Kristin OmbergPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States.
Emilie PurvinePacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States.
Karen TaylorPacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, WA, United States.
Christina L TingSandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, United States.
Murray WolinskyLos Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, NM, United States.
Gary XieLos Alamos National Laboratory, Bioscience Division, Los Alamos, NM, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Progress in modern biology is being driven, in part, by the large amounts of freely available data in public resources such as the International Nucleotide Sequence Database Collaboration (INSDC), the world's primary database of biological sequence (and related) information. INSDC and similar databases have dramatically increased the pace of fundamental biological discovery and enabled a host of innovative therapeutic, diagnostic, and forensic applications. However, as high-value, openly shared resources with a high degree of assumed trust, these repositories share compelling similarities to the early days of the Internet. Consequently, as public biological databases continue to increase in size and importance, we expect that they will face the same threats as undefended cyberspace. There is a unique opportunity, before a significant breach and loss of trust occurs, to ensure they evolve with quality and security as a design philosophy rather than costly "retrofitted" mitigations. This Perspective surveys some potential quality assurance and security weaknesses in existing open genomic and proteomic repositories, describes methods to mitigate the likelihood of both intentional and unintentional errors, and offers recommendations for risk mitigation based on lessons learned from cybersecurity.

Indexed as

bioeconomybiological databasesbiosecuritycyberbiosecuritycybersecuritymachine learning

Identifiers

PMID31024904
PMCPMC6460893

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.