Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024852›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2019

N

Zaira Ianniello, Alessandro Paiardini, Alessandro Fatica

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 80 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. YTHDF1 and YTHDC1 mJournal of virology · 2025
    Article
  8. Discovery of CRBN-recruiting PROTAC degraders of the METTL3-METTL14 complex.Medicinal chemistry research : an international journal for rapid communications on design and mechanisms of action of biologically active agents · 2025
    Article
  9. Comprehensive analysis of mComputational and structural biotechnology journal · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Small molecule inhibitors targeting mJournal of hematology & oncology · 2024
    Review
  12. The mGenes & diseases · 2024
    Article
  13. Review
  14. Exploring the role of mFrontiers in oncology · 2024
    Review
  15. mEpigenetics · 2023
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Overview of mJournal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023
    Review
  19. mInternational journal of oncology · 2023
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Zaira IannielloDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology "Charles Darwin," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro PaiardiniDepartment of Biochemical Sciences "A. Rossi Fanelli," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Alessandro FaticaDepartment of Biology and Biotechnology "Charles Darwin," Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
Sapienza University of Rome · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recent studies have uncovered an important role for RNA modifications in gene expression regulation, which led to the birth of the epitranscriptomics field. It is now acknowledged that RNA modifiers play a crucial role in the control of differentiation of stem and progenitor cells and that changes in their levels are a relevant feature of different types of cancer. To date, among more than 160 different RNA chemical modifications, the more relevant in cancer biology is the reversible and dynamic N

Indexed as

AMLepitranscriptomicsleukemiam6AMETTL14METTL3RNA

Identifiers

PMID31024852
PMCPMC6465620
OpenAlexW2937794641

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.