Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024779›Full record

ArticleApplications in plant sciences2019

Utilizing herbarium specimens to quantify historical mycorrhizal communities.

J Mason Heberling, David J Burke

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applications in plant sciences, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

J Mason HeberlingSection of Botany Carnegie Museum of Natural History 4400 Forbes Avenue Pittsburgh Pennsylvania 15213 USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0756-5090
David J BurkeThe Holden Arboretum 9500 Sperry Road Kirtland Ohio 44094 USA.
Carnegie Museum of Natural History · USU.S. National Arboretum · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

premise of the studyMycorrhiza are critical to ecosystem functioning, but a lack of historical baseline data limits our understanding of the long-term belowground effects of global change. Herbarium specimens may provide this needed insight. However, it is unknown whether DNA of arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF) can be reliably extracted from vascular plant specimen roots.

methodsWe sampled roots from herbarium specimens of four herbaceous forest species collected in western Pennsylvania between 1881-2008. Using molecular methods (terminal restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequence analysis), we quantified AMF communities from specimen roots and tested for contamination.

resultsWe successfully amplified AMF DNA from 44% (21/48) of the root but not leaf samples, indicating specimen contamination was negligible. As expected, there were significant differences in AMF composition between plant species ( DISCUSSION: Herbaria have potential as sources of valuable belowground microbial data to answer questions across geographic, temporal, and taxonomic scales otherwise not feasible. Ongoing methodological developments will only magnify this potential. Further tests are needed to determine curatorial practices that maximize this innovative use of herbarium specimens.

Indexed as

arbuscular mycorrhizal fungiArisaema triphyllumforest understoryherbarium specimensMaianthemum racemosumTrillium spp

Identifiers

PMID31024779
PMCPMC6476165
OpenAlexW2920571001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.