Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024711›Full record

ArticleFood science & nutrition2019

Tailoring bilberry powder functionality through preprocessing and drying.

Lovisa Eliasson, Gabriel Oliveira, Maria Ehrnell, Evelina Höglund, Marie Alminger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Food science & nutrition, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Lovisa EliassonRISE Research Institute of Sweden, Agrifood and Bioscience Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3171-1203
Gabriel OliveiraDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Food and Nutrition Science Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9583-091X
Maria EhrnellRISE Research Institute of Sweden, Agrifood and Bioscience Gothenburg Sweden.
Evelina HöglundRISE Research Institute of Sweden, Agrifood and Bioscience Gothenburg Sweden.
Marie AlmingerDepartment of Biology and Biological Engineering, Food and Nutrition Science Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg Sweden.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Berry powders are popular as ingredients in a range of food products, where they naturally provide flavor, color, texture, polyphenols, fiber, and other nutrients. The choices regarding processing techniques and conditions influence the quality attributes of berry powders. The aim of this study was to study the effects on bilberry powder functionalities of applying different preprocessing techniques (purée mixing and juice pressing vs. untreated whole berries) prior to hot air drying and milling. Drying of press cake reduced the drying time by 72% and increased the total apparent phenolic content of the final powder by 44%, as compared to the powder of dried whole berries. The press cake powder showed an easier flowing behavior than the powders from whole berries and puréed berries. Dispersibility (in water and dairy cream) was 60% higher for powders from whole berries and puréed berries, as compared to press cake. The total phenolic content of the dispersed powders was highest for whole berries and puréed berries. Bilberry powder functionality can be modulated through the selection of an appropriate preprocessing technique before drying and milling. This tailors the powder properties into food ingredients ready for different applications, without the need for additives.

Indexed as

bilberrydispersibilitydryingflowabilitypolyphenolsprocessing

Identifiers

PMID31024711
PMCPMC6475759

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.