Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024620›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2019

High-Density Genetic Linkage Maps Provide Novel Insights Into ZW/ZZ Sex Determination System and Growth Performance in Mud Crab (

Khor Waiho, Xi Shi, Hanafiah Fazhan, Shengkang Li, Yueling Zhang, Huaiping Zheng, Wenhua Liu, Shaobin Fang, Mhd Ikhwanuddin, Hongyu Ma

Open access · goldAbstract read
PubMed Full text at PMC Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
7.8field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Genome-Wide Association Study for Weight-Related Traits inAnimals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2025
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Monosex Populations of the Giant Freshwater PrawnInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Khor WaihoGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Xi ShiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Hanafiah FazhanGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Shengkang LiGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Yueling ZhangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Huaiping ZhengGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Wenhua LiuGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Shaobin FangGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Mhd IkhwanuddinSTU-UMT Joint Shellfish Research Laboratory, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Hongyu MaGuangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou, China.
Shantou University · CNQingdao National Laboratory for Marine Science and Technology · CNUniversiti Malaysia Terengganu · MY

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mud crab,

Indexed as

association analysisgenetic linkage mapQTLScylla paramamosainsex determination systemsex-specific SNP

Identifiers

PMID31024620
PMCPMC6459939
OpenAlexW2932718119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.