Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024536›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in immunology2019

Fix Your Membrane Receptor Imaging: Actin Cytoskeleton and CD4 Membrane Organization Disruption by Chemical Fixation.

Pedro M Pereira, David Albrecht, Siân Culley, Caron Jacobs, Mark Marsh, Jason Mercer, Ricardo Henriques

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Cryogenic light microscopy of vitrified samples with angstrom precision.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Direct observation of the effects of chemical fixation in MNT-1 cells: A SE-ADM and Raman study.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Pedro M PereiraMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
David AlbrechtMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Siân CulleyMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Caron JacobsMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Mark MarshMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Jason MercerMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Ricardo HenriquesMRC-Laboratory for Molecular Cell Biology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M022374/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00012/1Medical Research Council MR/K015826/1Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Single-molecule localization microscopy (SMLM) techniques allow near molecular scale resolution (~ 20 nm) as well as precise and robust analysis of protein organization at different scales. SMLM hardware, analytics and probes have been the focus of a variety of studies and are now commonly used in laboratories across the world. Protocol reliability and artifact identification are increasingly seen as important aspects of super-resolution microscopy. The reliability of these approaches thus requires in-depth evaluation so that biological findings are based on solid foundations. Here we explore how different fixation approaches that disrupt or preserve the actin cytoskeleton affect membrane protein organization. Using CD4 as a model, we show that fixation-mediated disruption of the actin cytoskeleton correlates with changes in CD4 membrane organization. We highlight how these artifacts are easy to overlook and how careful sample preparation is essential for extracting meaningful results from super-resolution microscopy.

Indexed as

Actin CytoskeletonAnimalsArtifactsCD4 AntigensCell MembraneChlorocebus aethiopsCOS CellsDiagnostic ErrorsFormaldehydeMicrofluidicsPolymersProtein ConformationReceptor AggregationReproducibility of ResultsSingle Molecule ImagingTissue FixationCD4 AntigensFormaldehydeparaformPolymersactin cortexartefact analysisCD4fixationsuper-resolution imaging

Identifiers

PMID31024536
PMCPMC6460894

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.