ReviewFrontiers in immunology2019
Biomarkers in Human Anaphylaxis: A Critical Appraisal of Current Evidence and Perspectives.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 124 citations in OpenAlex.
- Hypersensitivity reactions to contrast media: Part 2. Prevention of recurrent hypersensitivity reactions in adults. Updated guidelines by the ESUR Contrast Media Safety Committee.European radiology · 2025Guideline
- A systemic review and recommendation for an autopsy approach to death followed the COVID 19 vaccination.Forensic science international · 2022Pooled it
- The Platelet Activating Factor-Platelet Activating Factor Acetylhydrolase Enzyme Axis in Anaphylaxis: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Kounis Syndrome in the Modern Era: A Comprehensive Review of Allergic Acute Coronary Syndromes.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Novelties in the pragmatic management of anaphylaxis in pediatric age.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Review
- Eperisone-induced immediate hypersensitivity reactions.The Korean journal of internal medicine · 2026Review
- Alleviation of allergic rhinitis symptoms in an animal model byFrontiers in immunology · 2026Article
- Potential Molecular Biomarkers for Predicting and Monitoring Complications in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Lactate in Anaphylaxis: 100 Years On.Sports medicine (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Review
- IgE and non-IgE-mediated pathways in anaphylaxis.Seminars in immunopathology · 2025Review
- Perioperative anaphylaxis: an update on pathophysiology, diagnosis, and management.Canadian journal of anaesthesia = Journal canadien d'anesthesie · 2025Review
- A Microbial Endocrinology-Designed Discovery Platform to Identify Histamine-Degrading Probiotics: Proof of Concept in Poultry.Microorganisms · 2025Article
- Advances in Mechanisms of Anaphylaxis in Wheat Allergy: Utility of Rodent Models.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Case Report: An unusual case of cardiac anaphylaxis in the maintenance phase ofFrontiers in allergy · 2025Article
- Cardiac Arrest Due to Perioperative Anaphylactic Shock Induced by Re-Exposure to Propofol: A Case Report.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Article
- Article
- Identifying patients at risk of anaphylaxis.The World Allergy Organization journal · 2024Review
- Serum MRGPRX2 as a Long-term Biomarker for Iodinated Contrast Media-Induced Anaphylaxis.Allergy, asthma & immunology research · 2024Article
- Case Report: A Rare Case of Iodixanol-Induced Anaphylactic Shock in Cerebral Angiography.Journal of asthma and allergy · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Anaphylaxis is a type I hypersensitivity reaction that is potentially fatal if not promptly treated. It is a clinical diagnosis, although measurement of serial serum total mast cell tryptase (MCT) is gold standard and may help differentiate anaphylaxis from its mimics. The performance characteristics of MCT assays in anaphylaxis has been variable in previous studies, due to multiple factors including differences in the definition of anaphylaxis, methods of MCT interpretation, clinical setting of anaphylaxis, causative agents, and timing of blood sample. An international consensus equation for MCT to interpret mast cell activation has been proposed and recently validated in the context of peri-operative anaphylaxis during general anesthesia. There has been an interest in the detection of newer biomarkers in anaphylaxis including platelet activation factor (PAF), chymase, carboxypeptidase A3, dipeptidyl peptidase I (DPPI), basogranulin, and CCL-2. The key determinants of an ideal biomarker in anaphylaxis are half-life, sample handling and processing requirements, and cost. There may be a role for metabolomics and systems biology in the exploration of novel biomarkers in anaphylaxis. Future studies applying these approaches might provide greater insight into factors determining severity, clinical risk stratification, identification of mast cell disorders and improving our understanding of this relatively complex acute immunological condition. Post mortem MCT evaluation is used in Forensic Medicine during autopsy for cases involving sudden death or suspected anaphylaxis. Interpretation of post mortem MCT is challenging since there is limited published evidence and the test is confounded by multiple variables largely linked to putrefaction and site of sampling. Thus, there is no international consensus on a reference range. In this state of the art review, we will focus on the practical challenges in the laboratory diagnosis of anaphylaxis and critically appraise (a) performance characteristics of MCT in anaphylaxis in different clinical scenarios (b) the role for novel biomarkers and (c) post mortem MCT and its role in fatal anaphylaxis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.