Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024498›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019

Improving the Accuracy of Flow Cytometric Quantification of Microbial Populations in Sediments: Importance of Cell Staining Procedures.

Longhui Deng, Annika Fiskal, Xingguo Han, Nathalie Dubois, Stefano Michele Bernasconi, Mark Alexander Lever

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Longhui DengInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Annika FiskalInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Xingguo HanInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Nathalie DuboisSurface Waters Research-Management, Eawag, Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology, Dübendorf, Switzerland.
Stefano Michele BernasconiDepartment of Earth Sciences, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.
Mark Alexander LeverInstitute of Biogeochemistry and Pollutant Dynamics, ETH Zürich, Zurich, Switzerland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The accuracy of flow cytometric (FCM) quantifications of microbial populations in sediments varies with FCM settings, cell extraction and staining protocols, as well as sample types. In the present study, we improve the accuracy of FCM for enumerating microorganisms inhabiting diverse lake and marine sediment types based on extensive tests with FCM settings, extraction buffer chemical compositions, cell separation methods, and staining procedures. Tests on the FCM settings, (e.g., acquisition time, rates of events) and salinity of extraction solutions show minor impacts on FCM enumerations and yields of cell extraction, respectively. Existing methods involving hydrofluoric acid (HF) treatment to release sediment-attached cells into solution prove effective on both marine and freshwater samples. Yet, different staining techniques (direct staining of cell extracts, staining of membrane-filtered cell extracts) produce clear differences in cell number estimates. We demonstrate that, while labor-intensive membrane-staining generates high cell staining efficiency and accurate cell counts that are consistent across FCM and epifluorescence microscopy-based (EFM) quantification methods, accurate cell counts determined by more time- and labor-efficient direct staining require consideration of dye concentration, sample dilution, and lithology. Yet, good agreement between the two staining methods can be achieved through sample-specific adjustments of dye concentrations and sample dilutions during direct staining. We thus present a complete protocol for FCM-based cell quantification, that includes all steps from the initial sample fixation to the final enumeration, with recommendations for buffer compositions, direct and membrane-based staining procedures, and the final FCM assay. This protocol is versatile, accurate, and reliable, as is evident from good agreement with cell quantifications by EFM and quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) of 16S rRNA genes across a wide range of sedimentary sample types.

Indexed as

cell countsepifluorescence microscopyflow cytometrylacustrinemarinemicrobial populationsstaining technique

Identifiers

PMID31024498
PMCPMC6465615

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.