ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2019
Response of
Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Strategic antagonism: howFrontiers in microbiology · 2025Review
- Deciphering the Crucial Roles of the Quorum-Sensing Transcription Factor SdiA in NADPH Metabolism and (Antioxidants (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Systematic elucidation of independently modulated genes in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum reveals a trade-off between secondary and primary metabolism.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Article
- Expanding the genetic programmability of Lactiplantibacillus plantarum.Microbial biotechnology · 2024Review
- Light-Based Anti-Biofilm and Antibacterial Strategies.Pharmaceutics · 2023Review
- Antibacterial and Antibiofilm Effects of Lactobacilli Strains against Clinical Isolates ofAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Fungal-Lactobacteria Consortia and Enzymatic Catalysis for Polylactic Acid Production.Journal of fungi (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Targeted Anti-Biofilm Therapy: Dissecting Targets in the Biofilm Life Cycle.Pharmaceuticals (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022Review
- Review
- Acetate ActivatesApplied and environmental microbiology · 2021Article
- Proteomics Reveals Distinct Changes Associated with Increased Gamma Radiation Resistance in the Black YeastGenes · 2020Article
- Genome Analysis ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
- Investigating the Mechanistic Differences of Obesity-InducingFrontiers in microbiology · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The bacterial quorum sensing phenomenon has been well studied since its discovery and has traditionally been considered to include signaling pathways recognized exclusively within either Gram-positive or Gram-negative bacteria. These groups of bacteria synthesize structurally distinct signaling molecules to mediate quorum sensing, where Gram-positive bacteria traditionally utilize small autoinducing peptides (AIPs) and Gram-negatives use small molecules such as acyl-homoserine lactones (AHLs). The structural differences between the types of signaling molecules have historically implied a lack of cross-talk among Gram-positive and Gram-negative quorum sensing systems. Recent investigations, however, have demonstrated the ability for AIPs and AHLs to be produced by non-canonical organisms, implying quorum sensing systems may be more universally recognized than previously hypothesized. With that in mind, our interests were piqued by the organisms
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.