Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024432›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in neurology2019

Neurofilament Light Chain as a Biomarker in Multiple Sclerosis.

Kristin N Varhaug, Øivind Torkildsen, Kjell-Morten Myhr, Christian A Vedeler

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in neurology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05417269 (A Phase I/II Dose Escalation/Adaptive Design Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of IMCY-0141 in Patients With Relapsing Remitting-Multiple Sclerosis), which is not on this map. Cited by 98 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
98citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05417269 phase1 / phase2unknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2022, after this paper: background citation

A Phase I/II Dose Escalation/Adaptive Design Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of IMCY-0141 in Patients With Relapsing Remitting-Multiple Sclerosis (RR-MS)

TypeinterventionalSponsorImcyse SARan2022 to 2025Enrolled150ConditionsMultiple Sclerosis, Relapsing-RemittingArmsIMCY-0141, Placebo, Dimethyl Fumarate
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

98 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 185 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Neuronal Calcium Signaling and Cytoskeletal Dynamics in Neurodegeneration.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. NfL as a biomarker in ATTRv amyloidosis: potential and limitations.Neurological sciences : official journal of the Italian Neurological Society and of the Italian Society of Clinical Neurophysiology · 2025
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Review

38 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kristin N VarhaugDepartment of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Øivind TorkildsenDepartment of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Kjell-Morten MyhrDepartment of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
Christian A VedelerDepartment of Neurology, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
University of Bergen · NO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to the unpredictable course and heterogenous treatment response in multiple sclerosis (MS), there is a clear need for biomarkers that reflect disease activity in the clinical follow-up of these patients. Neurofilaments are neuron-specific components of the cytoskeleton that can be assayed in different body compartments. They have been explored as potential biomarkers for many years. Neurofilament light chain (NF-L) appears the most promising biomarker in MS patients, and there is now little doubt that NF-L should have a role in the follow-up of MS patients. Newer assays and techniques for NF-L detection available in serum samples confirms the usefulness of NF-L as a biomarker. Nevertheless, there is still a need for prospective studies, and studies to determine clinical useful cut-off values. This review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of NF-L as a biomarker in patients with MS.

Indexed as

axonal damagebiomarkercerebrospinal Fluid—CSFmultiple scleorsis (MS)neurofilament light (NF-L)serum

Identifiers

PMID31024432
PMCPMC6460359
OpenAlexW2930999271

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.