Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024076›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2019

Antimicrobial removal on piglets promotes health and higher bacterial diversity in the nasal microbiota.

Florencia Correa-Fiz, José Maurício Gonçalves Dos Santos, Francesc Illas, Virginia Aragon

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Microbial genomics · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Analysis of the Nasal Microbiota in Healthy and Diseased Pigs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Experimental Infection withVeterinary sciences · 2022
    Article
  15. Serotyping and Antimicrobial Susceptibility Profiling ofPathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Florencia Correa-FizIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain. flor.correa@irta.cat.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9459-5871
José Maurício Gonçalves Dos SantosUnicesumar-Centro Universitário de Maringá, Maringá, Paraná, Brazil.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2107-1137
Francesc IllasSelección Batallé, Avinguda dels segadors, 17421, Riudarenes, Spain.
Virginia AragonIRTA, Centre de Recerca en Sanitat Animal (CReSA, IRTA-UAB), Campus de la Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193, Bellaterra, Spain.
Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESCentro Universitário Cesumar · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The view on antimicrobials has dramatically changed due to the increased knowledge on the importance of microbiota composition in different body parts. Antimicrobials can no longer be considered only beneficial, but also potentially deleterious for favourable bacterial populations. Still, the use of metaphylactic antimicrobial treatment at early stages of life is a practice in use in porcine production. Many reports have shown that antibiotics can critically affect the gut microbiota, however the effect of perinatal antimicrobial treatment on the nasal microbiota has not been explored yet. To gain insights on the potential changes in nasal microbial composition due to antimicrobial treatments, piglets from two different farms were sampled at weaning. The nasal microbiota was analysed when antimicrobial treatment was used early in life, and later, when no antimicrobial treatment was used during the lactation period. Removal of perinatal antimicrobials resulted in an increased bacterial diversity in nasal microbiota at weaning. Concurrently, elimination of antimicrobials produced an increase in the relative abundance of Prevotella and Lactobacillus, and a decrease in Moraxella and Bergeyella. These changes in microbiota composition were accompanied by an improvement of the piglets' health and a higher productivity in the nursery phase.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsFlavobacteriaceaeGastrointestinal MicrobiomeMicrobiotaMoraxellaNoseRNA, Ribosomal, 16SSwineAnti-Bacterial AgentsRNA, Ribosomal, 16S

Identifiers

PMID31024076
PMCPMC6484018
OpenAlexW2941228923

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.