ArticleScientific reports2019
Ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers with segmental or equivalent refractive indices.
Article in Scientific reports, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 41 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
41 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prediction of cycloplegic refraction for noninvasive screening of children for refractive error.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Clinical evaluation of a new fully automated biometer integrating optical low-coherence reflectometry and Placido-disk topography.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2026Article
- Refractive outcomes after cataract surgery using swept-source OCT biometry and image-guided toric IOL alignment: a prospective comparative study in normal versus long axial length eyes.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Clinical Comparative Evaluation of Two New-Generation Optical Biometers: Intrasession Repeatability and Agreement of Biometric Parameters.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Theoretical influence of segmented axial length on intraocular lens power calculation in short eyes.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025Article
- Ocular Biometry and Refractive Prediction in Short Eyes: A Comparison of Two Swept-Source Optical Coherence Tomography-Based Biometers.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
- One-year outcomes of a trifocal intraocular lens with glistening-free hydrophobic acrylic using the mix-and-match technique.BMC ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Evaluation of a Simple and Accurate Method for Intraocular Lens Constant Optimization Using Linear Interpolation.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Level of Agreement of Intraocular Lens Power Measurements Between a Swept-Source OCT Biometer and a Partial Coherence Interferometer.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Refractive accuracy of the new Barrett formula using segmented axial length compared with that of the traditional Barrett Universal II formula.Journal of cataract and refractive surgery · 2025Article
- Refractive Accuracy of a Novel Swept-Source OCT in Patients With Short and Long Eyes.Journal of ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Recent Advances in Ophthalmic Interventions: Exploring Innovations in Myopia, Cataract Surgery, and Visual Function.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Comparison of two swept-source optical biometers in eyes with long axial length.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- A Retrospective Trial Comparing Prediction Accuracy of Three Biometers in Short, Medium, and Long Eyes.Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.) · 2025Article
- Predictive Accuracy of Intraocular Lens Formulas Calculated by Biometers with Multiple Refractive Indices According to Axial Length.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- IOL power calculation in long eyes: Selection of the best axial length adjustement factor using the most common formulas.Heliyon · 2024Article
- Accuracy Validation of the New Barrett True Axial Length Formula and the Optimized Lens Factor Using Sum-of-Segment Biometry.Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Evaluation of Selected Biometric Parameters in Cataract Patients-A Comparison between ArgosMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2024Article
- Evaluation of a new dynamic real-time visualization 25 kHz swept-source optical coherence tomography based biometer.Eye and vision (London, England) · 2024Article
- Comparison of ocular biometry and refractive outcomes using two swept-source optical coherence tomography-based biometers.PloS one · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study compared the axial length (AL), central corneal thickness (CCT), anterior chamber depth (ACD), lens thickness (LT), mean anterior corneal radius of curvature (Rm), and postoperative refractive outcomes obtained from two different swept-source optical coherence biometers, the ARGOS (Movu, Nagoya, Japan), which uses the segmental refractive index for each segment, and the IOLMaster 700 (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany), which uses an equivalent refractive index for the entire eye. One hundred and six eyes of 106 patients with cataracts were included. The refractive outcomes using the Barrett Universal II, Haigis, Hoffer Q, and SRK/T formulas were evaluated. The mean AL, CCT, ACD, and Rm differed significantly (P < 0.001) with the IOLMaster 700 (25.22 mm, 559 µm, 3.23 mm, and 7.69 mm) compared with the ARGOS (25.14 mm, 533 µm, 3.33 mm, and 7.66 mm). The mean LTs did not differ significantly. The percentages of eyes within ±0.50 and ±1.00 diopter of the predicted refraction did not differ significantly (P > 0.05). The accuracy of the intraocular lens power calculations was clinically acceptable with both biometers, although the ocular biometry using these two biometers exhibited certain differences.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.