Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31024009›Full record

ArticleScientific data2019

MIReAD, a minimum information standard for reporting arthropod abundance data.

Samuel S C Rund, Kyle Braak, Lauren Cator, Kyle Copas, Scott J Emrich, Gloria I Giraldo-Calderón, Michael A Johansson, Naveed Heydari, Donald Hobern, Sarah A Kelly and 10 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific data, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Sharing insect data through GBIF: novel monitoring methods, opportunities and standards.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Characterizing the Vector Data Ecosystem.Journal of medical entomology · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors.

Samuel S C RundVectorBase, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA. srund@nd.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1701-7787
Kyle BraakGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Secretariat, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Lauren CatorDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire, United Kingdom.
Kyle CopasGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Secretariat, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6590-599X
Scott J EmrichDepartment of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science, University of Tennessee, Knoxville, TN, USA.
Gloria I Giraldo-CalderónVectorBase, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN, USA.
Michael A JohanssonDivision of Vector-Borne Diseases, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1324 Calle Cañada, San Juan, PR, USA.
Naveed HeydariCenter for Global Health and Translational Science, State University of New York Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY, USA.
Donald HobernGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Secretariat, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6492-4016
Sarah A KellyVectorBase and Vector Immunogenomics and Infection Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.
Daniel LawsonVectorBase and Vector Immunogenomics and Infection Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7765-983X
Cynthia LordFlorida Medical Entomology Lab, University of Florida-IFAS, Vero Beach, FL, USA.
Robert M MacCallumVectorBase and Vector Immunogenomics and Infection Laboratory, Department of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5070-4493
Dominique G RocheInstitute of Biology, University of Neuchâtel, 2000, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Sadie J RyanQuantitative Disease Ecology and Conservation Lab, Department of Geography, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-6321
Dmitry SchigelGlobal Biodiversity Information Facility (GBIF) Secretariat, Copenhagen, Denmark.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2919-1168
Kurt VandegriftCenter for Infectious Disease Dynamics, Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA, USA.
Matthew WattsDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0364-9406
Jennifer M ZaspelDepartment of Zoology, Milwaukee Public Museum, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Samraat PawarDepartment of Life Sciences, Imperial College London, Silwood Park Campus, Buckhurst Road, Ascot, Berkshire, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8375-5684

Funding

Spatial eco-epidemiology of tick-borne rickettisal pathogens R01AI136035 · NIAID · OLD DOMINION UNIVERSITY · PI GAFF, HOLLY · 2017 to 2021
$2.4M
US-UK Collab: RCN: Vector Behavior in Transmission Ecology (VectorBiTE)R01AI122284 · NIAID · VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INST AND ST UNIV · PI JOHNSON, LEAH RENEE · 2015 to 2019
$520k
ACL HHS U01CK000510NCEZID CDC HHS U01 CK000510NIAID NIH HHS HHSN272201400029CNIAID NIH HHS R01 AI122284NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI136035
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthropods play a dominant role in natural and human-modified terrestrial ecosystem dynamics. Spatially-explicit arthropod population time-series data are crucial for statistical or mathematical models of these dynamics and assessment of their veterinary, medical, agricultural, and ecological impacts. Such data have been collected world-wide for over a century, but remain scattered and largely inaccessible. In particular, with the ever-present and growing threat of arthropod pests and vectors of infectious diseases, there are numerous historical and ongoing surveillance efforts, but the data are not reported in consistent formats and typically lack sufficient metadata to make reuse and re-analysis possible. Here, we present the first-ever minimum information standard for arthropod abundance, Minimum Information for Reusable Arthropod Abundance Data (MIReAD). Developed with broad stakeholder collaboration, it balances sufficiency for reuse with the practicality of preparing the data for submission. It is designed to optimize data (re)usability from the "FAIR," (Findable, Accessible, Interoperable, and Reusable) principles of public data archiving (PDA). This standard will facilitate data unification across research initiatives and communities dedicated to surveillance for detection and control of vector-borne diseases and pests.

Indexed as

ArthropodsAnimalsBiodiversityEcosystemInformation DisseminationInformation Storage and RetrievalPopulation Dynamics

Identifiers

PMID31024009
PMCPMC6484025

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.