Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31023996›Full record

ArticleAnnals of transplantation2019

Living Anonymous Renal Donors Do Not Regret: Intermediate and Long-Term Follow-Up with a Focus on Motives and Psychosocial Outcomes.

Jonas Wadström, Bengt von Zur-Mühlen, Annette Lennerling, Kerstin Westman, Lars Wennberg, Ingela Fehrman Ekholm

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of transplantation, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Anonymity in Kidney Paired Donation: A Systematic Review of Reasons.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Twenty Years of Unspecified Kidney Donation: Unspecified Donors Looking Back on Their Donation Experiences.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Factors Associated with the Willingness to Become a Living Kidney Donor: A National Cross-Sectional Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Jonas WadströmDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Bengt von Zur-MühlenDepartment of Transplant Surgery, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala, Sweden.
Annette LennerlingTransplant Institute, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden.
Kerstin WestmanDepartment of Nephrology and Transplantation, Skåne University Hospital, Malmö, Sweden.
Lars WennbergDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Ingela Fehrman EkholmDepartment of Transplantation Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Huddinge, Sweden.
Karolinska University Hospital · SESahlgrenska University Hospital · SESkåne University Hospital · SEUppsala University Hospital · SE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND Living anonymous donation (LAD) of kidneys was introduced in Sweden in 2004. This study reports on outcomes of Swedish LAD experiences from 2004 to 2016, focusing on donors' motives, the care they received, psychosocial aspects, and medical status at follow-up. MATERIAL AND METHODS Donor data were collected through a physician interview, medical check-up, review of medical charts, the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HADS), and a routine national questionnaire. Of the 26 LADs during the study period, 1 donor died and 1 declined to participate, leaving a study population of 24. RESULTS Half of the donors were male, which is a higher proportion than for directed living donors. The major motive detected was altruism. Of the 24 LADs, 96% were very satisfied and would donate again if possible, 46% noted increased self-esteem, and a third were happier after the donation. Sixty-two percent received anonymous information about the recipient and 40% would have liked to meet the recipient. HADS scores were normal. Two donors had antidepressant treatment, 1 of whom had received treatment before donation. Half mentioned that the pre-donation assessment took too long. At follow-up, mean eGFR was 62±12 mL/min/1.73 m², of which 16 were in CKD II and 8 were in CKD III. Four donors had developed hypertension, 1 of whom also developed type 2 diabetes. CONCLUSIONS Swedish LADs are very satisfied and medical outcomes are acceptable. We propose that the transplant community and the National Board of Health and Welfare take a more active approach to informing the general public about LAD.

Indexed as

AltruismAdultAgedEmotionsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansKidney TransplantationLiving DonorsMaleMiddle AgedMotivation

Identifiers

PMID31023996
PMCPMC6507493
OpenAlexW2941420188

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.