Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31023863›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2019

A Pilot, Phase II, Randomized, Open-Label Clinical Trial Comparing the Neurotoxicity of Three Dose Regimens of Nab-Paclitaxel to That of Solvent-Based Paclitaxel as the First-Line Treatment for Patients with Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Type 2-Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer.

Eva Ciruelos, María Apellániz-Ruiz, Blanca Cantos, Noelia Martinez-Jáñez, Coralia Bueno-Muiño, Maria-Jose Echarri, Santos Enrech, Juan-Antonio Guerra, Luis Manso, Tomas Pascual and 5 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01763710 (Neurotoxicity Characterization Phase II Randomized Study of Nab-paclitaxel Versus Conventional Paclitaxel as First-line Therapy of Metastatic HER2-negative Breast Cancer.), which is not on this map. Cited by 16 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT01763710 phase2completednot on this map

Neurotoxicity Characterization Phase II Randomized Study of Nab-paclitaxel Versus Conventional Paclitaxel as First-line Therapy of Metastatic HER2-negative Breast Cancer.

TypeinterventionalSponsorFundacion OncosurRan2012 to 2015Enrolled60ConditionsBreast CancerArmsPaclitaxel 80 mg/m2, Nab-paclitaxel 100 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15, Nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 days 1, 8 and 15, Nab-paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 days 1 and 15
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Quality-of-life measures in pharmacogenomic studies: a systematic review.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Frontiers in pharmacology · 2023
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Eva CiruelosMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain eva.ciruelos@gmail.com.
María Apellániz-RuizHereditary Endocrine Cancer Group, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Blanca CantosOncosur Study Group, Madrid, Spain.
Noelia Martinez-JáñezOncosur Study Group, Madrid, Spain.
Coralia Bueno-MuiñoOncosur Study Group, Madrid, Spain.
Maria-Jose EcharriOncosur Study Group, Madrid, Spain.
Santos EnrechOncosur Study Group, Madrid, Spain.
Juan-Antonio GuerraOncosur Study Group, Madrid, Spain.
Luis MansoMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Tomas PascualMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Cristina DominguezMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Juan-Francisco GonzaloMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Juan-Luis SanzClinical Research Department, Apoyo a la Investigación Clínica en España (APICES), Madrid, Spain.
Cristina Rodriguez-AntonaHereditary Endocrine Cancer Group, Human Cancer Genetics Programme, Spanish National Cancer Research Center (CNIO), Madrid, Spain.
Juan-Manuel SepúlvedaMedical Oncology Department, Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
Hospital Universitario 12 De Octubre · ESCentro de Investigación del Cáncer · ESHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada · ESHospital Universitario de Getafe · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Cristina · ESHospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda · ESHospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal · ESHospital Universitario Severo Ochoa · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study aimed to characterize the neurotoxicity of three different regimens of nab-paclitaxel compared with a standard regimen of solvent-based (sb) paclitaxel for the first-line treatment of HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer based on the Total Neurotoxicity Score (TNS), a tool specifically developed to assess chemotherapy-induced neurotoxicity. MATERIALS AND

methodsThis was a randomized, open-label study testing 4-week cycles of 80 mg/m

resultsNeurotoxicity, as evaluated by the TNS, did not significantly differ between the sb-paclitaxel group and any of the nab-paclitaxel groups. The frequency of (any grade) polyneuropathy, as measured by the NCI-CTCAE, was lower in the PACL80/w (

conclusionThe results of this exploratory study showed that, regardless of the dose, nab-paclitaxel did not differ from sb-paclitaxel in terms of neurotoxicity as evaluated with the TNS. However, results from NCI-CTCAE, dose delays and reductions, and functional tools consistently indicate that NAB150/w regimen is associated with a greater risk of chemotherapy-induced neuropathy. Thus, our results question the superiority of the TNS over NCI-CTCAE for evaluating chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and guiding treatment decisions in this context. The selection of the nab-paclitaxel regimen should be individualized based on the clinical context and potentially supported by pharmacogenetic analysis. Registry: EudraCT, 2012-002361-36; NCT01763710 IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: The results of this study call into question the superiority of the Total Neurotoxicity Score over the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events for evaluating chemotherapy-induced neuropathy and guiding treatment decisions in this context and suggest that a regimen of 150 mg/m

Indexed as

AgedAlbuminsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicBreast NeoplasmsDose-Response Relationship, DrugDrug Administration ScheduleErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedPaclitaxelPolymorphism, GeneticPolyneuropathiesQuality of LifeReceptors, Eph Family130-nm albumin-bound paclitaxelAlbuminsAntineoplastic Agents, PhytogenicERBB2 protein, humanErb-b2 Receptor Tyrosine KinasesPaclitaxelReceptors, Eph FamilyMetastatic breast cancerNab‐paclitaxelNeurotoxicityPaclitaxelPolyneuropathyTotal neurotoxicity score

Identifiers

PMID31023863
PMCPMC6853092
OpenAlexW2940606112

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.