Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31023700›Full record

Trial reportBlood2019

Efficacy of venetoclax in relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia is influenced by disease and response variables.

Andrew W Roberts, Shuo Ma, Thomas J Kipps, Steven E Coutre, Matthew S Davids, Barbara Eichhorst, Michael Hallek, John C Byrd, Kathryn Humphrey, Lang Zhou and 8 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readClinical Trial, Phase IClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in Blood, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 103 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
103citing papers in PubMed
17.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

103 citing papers in PubMed, 169 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Venetoclax in Previously Treated Waldenström Macroglobulinemia.Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology · 2022
    Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review

43 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors at 11 institutions in 4 countries.

Andrew W RobertsRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7341-5720
Shuo MaRobert H. Lurie Comprehensive Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Thomas J KippsMoores Cancer Center, University of California School of Medicine, San Diego, CA.
Steven E CoutreStanford Cancer Center, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford CA.
Matthew S DavidsDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Barbara EichhorstDepartment I of Internal Medicine and.
Michael HallekUniversity Hospital Cologne and Center for Integrated Oncology Cologne-Bonn, University of Cologne, Cologne, Germany.
John C ByrdDivision of Hematology, Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH.
Kathryn HumphreyF. Hoffman-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland.
Lang ZhouAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL.
Brenda ChylaAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL.
Jacqueline NielsenAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL.
Jalaja PotluriAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL.
Su Young KimAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL.
Maria VerdugoAbbVie Inc., North Chicago, IL.
Stephan StilgenbauerInternal Medicine III, Ulm University, Ulm, Germany; and.
William G WierdaMD Anderson Cancer Center, University of Texas, Houston, TX.
John F SeymourRoyal Melbourne Hospital, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2188-6835
AbbVie (United States) · USThe Royal Melbourne Hospital · AUHarvard University · USNorthwestern University · USRoche (Switzerland) · CHStanford University · USThe Ohio State University · USThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USUniversität Ulm · DEUniversity of California San Diego · USUniversity of Cologne · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To define the efficacy of venetoclax with extended follow-up and identify clinical or biological treatment effect modifiers, updated data for previously treated patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) or small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL) enrolled in 4 early-phase trials were pooled. Rates of response, complete remission (CR/CRi), and undetectable minimal residual disease (U-MRD) were analyzed for all patients (n = 436) and for those patients who were planned to receive 400 mg/day monotherapy (n = 347). Univariate and multiple regression analyses were performed to identify the pretreatment factors associated with response rates and duration of response (DoR). Objective responses were documented in 75% of all patients, including 22% CR/CRi. Overall, 27% and 16% of the patients achieved U-MRD in blood and marrow, respectively. Estimated median progression-free survival (PFS), DoR, and time to progression were 30.2, 38.4, and 36.9 months, respectively. Similar efficacy outcomes were observed within the 400 mg/day monotherapy subset. For those who achieved CR/CRi, the 3-year PFS estimate was 83%. DoR was superior for patients achieving CR/CRi or U-MRD in landmark analyses. In multiple regression analyses, bulky lymphadenopathy (≥5 cm) and refractoriness to B-cell receptor inhibitor (BCRi) therapy were significantly associated with lower CR rate and shorter DoR. Fewer prior therapies were associated with higher CR rate, but not DoR. Chromosome 17p deletion and/or

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicFemaleHumansKaplan-Meier EstimateLeukemia, Lymphocytic, Chronic, B-CellMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalProgression-Free SurvivalSulfonamidesAntineoplastic AgentsBridged Bicyclo Compounds, HeterocyclicSulfonamidesvenetoclax

Identifiers

PMID31023700
PMCPMC6624969
OpenAlexW2940785776

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.