ArticleAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2019
Article in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Phenotypic and Molecular Features of a Large ODDD Family: Expanding the Spectrum of CX43-Related Disorder.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
- A GJA1 Variant Triggers Earlier SPG4 Onset by Destabilizing Deubiquitinase VCPIP1 to Lower SPASTIN Levels.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2026Article
- Novel Mutation Causing Oculodentodigital Dysplasia: A Rare Cause of Spastic Paraparesis Not to Miss.Movement disorders clinical practice · 2025Article
- Human iPSC-Derived Astrocytes: A Powerful Tool to Study Primary Astrocyte Dysfunction in the Pathogenesis of Rare Leukodystrophies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021Review
- Hypomyelinating leukodystrophies - unravelling myelin biology.Nature reviews. Neurology · 2021Review
- HeterozygousMolecular vision · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oculodentodigital dysplasia is an autosomal dominant disorder due to
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.