Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31023596›Full record

ArticleMedical engineering & physics2019

A portable bioimpedance instrument for monitoring residual limb fluid volume in people with transtibial limb loss: A technical note.

Paul Hinrichs, John C Cagle, Joan E Sanders

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical engineering & physics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04494555 (Do Adaptable Sockets Improve Military Performance?), which is not on this map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04494555 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2020, after this paper: background citation

Do Adaptable Sockets Improve Military Performance?

TypeinterventionalSponsorBrooke Army Medical CenterRan2020 to 2024Enrolled15ConditionsAmputation StumpArmsStatic socket, User adjusted socket, Microprocessor-adjusting sockets
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Paul HinrichsDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 355061, 3720 15th Ave NE, Seattle WA 98195, United States.
John C CagleDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 355061, 3720 15th Ave NE, Seattle WA 98195, United States.
Joan E SandersDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Washington, 355061, 3720 15th Ave NE, Seattle WA 98195, United States. Electronic address: jsanders@u.washington.edu.

Funding

Measuring In-Socket Residual Limb Volume FluctuationR01HD060585 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI SANDERS, JOAN E. · 2009 to 2024
$6.6M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD060585
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People with transtibial limb loss experience daily changes in volume of their residual limb that affect the fit of their prosthetic socket. A portable instrument was developed to monitor fluid volume changes outside of the laboratory setting. The bioimpedance system applied 26 current bursts per second at frequencies between 3 kHz and 1 MHz, and sensed voltage at up to six channels. Among six voltage-controlled current source circuits and five receive-channel amplifier topologies considered, a differential Howland current pump and a single receive-channel instrumentation amplifier proved the best combination of low noise and low power consumption. Mean RMS errors were 0.07% for extracellular fluid resistance, 2.23% for intracellular fluid resistance, and 1.15% for membrane capacitance.

Indexed as

Artificial LimbsHydrodynamicsCalibrationElectric ImpedanceExtracellular SpaceHumansMaleMiddle AgedTibiaAmputeeBioimpedanceFluid volumeProsthetic fitResidual limbVolume accommodation

Identifiers

PMID31023596
PMCPMC7417189

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.