Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31023254›Full record

ArticleBMC pregnancy and childbirth2019

Women's recall of health care provider counselling on gestational weight gain (GWG): a prospective, population-based study.

Angela Vinturache, Anika Winn, Cynthia Mannion, Suzanne Tough

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC pregnancy and childbirth, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Inappropriate use of clinical practices in Canada: a systematic review.CMAJ : Canadian Medical Association journal = journal de l'Association medicale canadienne · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Coping with Stress in Complicated Pregnancy and Gestational Weight Gain.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.

Angela VinturacheDepartment of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada. angela.vinturache@doctors.org.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2432-2616
Anika WinnFaculty of Health Sciences, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Cynthia MannionFaculty of Nursing, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Suzanne ToughDepartment of Paediatrics, Cumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
University of Calgary · CA

Funding

Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions 200700595Institute of Human Development, Child and Youth Health n/aO'Brien Centre Summer Studentship n/a
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundPrenatal care has been validated to provide medical and educational counselling intended to reduce the risk of adverse pregnancy conditions and improve the maternal and fetal outcomes. Prenatal targeted information regarding nutrition, lifestyle, and weight gain is predictive of meeting Institute of Medicine (IOM) 2009 gestational weight gain (GWG) guidelines. There is limited information about women's experiences with these prenatal counselling domains, particularly in women who do not meet GWG recommendations. The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of women's recall of prenatal counselling and its effect on meeting their GWG within guidelines in a prospective, community-based pregnancy cohort.

methodsA sample of 2909 women with singleton pregnancies was drawn from the prospective community-based pregnancy cohort All Our Families from Alberta, Canada. Women were stratified into three GWG groups, adequate, inadequate, and excessive GWG, based on pre-pregnancy BMI and the adherence to the Institute of Medicine weight gain in pregnancy guidelines. At less than 25 and 34 to 36 weeks' gestation, maternal socio-demographic information and women's recall of prenatal counselling experiences was collected through self-administered questionnaires. Multivariate logistic regression analyses tested GWG strata impact on women's recall of the prenatal counselling advice in eight domains of nutrition, lifestyle, and weight management during pregnancy.

resultsAdequate GWG was reached by 35.9% of women, 46.5% gained excessive and 17.6% gained inadequate weight. Women who were overweight and obese prior to pregnancy were more likely to gain excessive weight than women who were normal weight (OR 3.3, 95% CI 2.6-4.1; and OR 2.9, 95% CI 2.1-3.9, respectively). Most women reported having no difficulties in finding prenatal care, felt comfortable with their health care provider and were satisfied with the answers received. There was no difference in the recall of prenatal advice received in any of the eight domains of prenatal counselling assessed among women with appropriate and non-optimal GWG.

conclusionWomen with adequate and non-optimal GWG received comparable prenatal counselling on nutrition, weight gain, and lifestyle modifications. There remain missed opportunities in targeting prenatal counselling advice to women at risk for suboptimal or excessive GWG.

Indexed as

Gestational Weight GainPrenatal CarePrenatal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAlbertaCohort StudiesCounselingFemaleHumansPractice Guidelines as TopicPregnancyProspective StudiesSocial ClassGestational weight gainHealth care providerLifestyleNutritionObesity in pregnancyPrenatal counsellingWomen experiences

Identifiers

PMID31023254
PMCPMC6485057
OpenAlexW2941021537

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.