ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2019
Lower Hospitalization and Healthcare Costs With Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker in a Retrospective Analysis of Patients With Heart Failure.
Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sacubitril/valsartan in real-life European patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.ESC heart failure · 2021Pooled it
- A Systematic Review of Medical Costs Associated with Heart Failure in the USA (2014-2020).PharmacoEconomics · 2020Pooled it
- Comparing the cost of cirrhosis to other common chronic diseases: A longitudinal study in a large national insurance database.Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.) · 2025Article
- Angiotensin receptor-neprilysin inhibitor adherence and outcomes in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2025Article
- Dosing patterns and dose effects of sacubitril/valsartan: A claims-based retrospective cohort study.PloS one · 2025Article
- Review
- Burden of Repeated Hospitalizations on Patients with Heart Failure: An Analysis of Administrative and Claims Data in Japan.Drugs - real world outcomes · 2022Article
- Hospitalization Rates in Patients with Heart Failure and Reduced Ejection Fraction Initiating Sacubitril/Valsartan or Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors/Angiotensin Receptor Blockers: A Retrospective Cohort Study.Cardiology and therapy · 2022Article
- Effects of sacubitril-valsartan on heart failure patients with mid-range ejection fractions: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2022Review
- Combination of ivabradine and sacubitril/valsartan in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fraction.ESC heart failure · 2021Article
- Implementation of sacubitril/valsartan in Sweden: clinical characteristics, titration patterns, and determinants.ESC heart failure · 2020Article
- Contemporary Patterns of Medicare and Medicaid Utilization and Associated Spending on Sacubitril/Valsartan and Ivabradine in Heart Failure.JAMA cardiology · 2020Article
- Hospitalization and Mortality in Patients With Heart Failure Treated With Sacubitril/Valsartan vs. Enalapril: A Real-World, Population-Based Study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2020Article
- A global perspective on the costs of hypertension: a systematic review.Archives of medical science : AMS · 2020Review
- Lower Hospitalization and Healthcare Costs With Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitor or Angiotensin-Receptor Blocker in a Retrospective Analysis of Patients With Heart Failure.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2019Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Outcomes data among patients with heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction treated with sacubitril/valsartan ( SAC / VAL ) are largely limited to clinical trial results. We compared hospitalization and healthcare costs among real-world patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL versus angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin-receptor blocker ( ACEI / ARB ). Methods and Results Using retrospective administrative claims data, stable patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL or ACEI / ARB from October 2015 to June 2016 were identified. Postindex hospitalization and healthcare costs were assessed in propensity-matched cohorts using robust variance estimation. Time to first hospitalization was modeled using unadjusted Kaplan-Meier estimates and multivariable models. Postindex all-cause healthcare costs were modeled using an adjusted multivariable model. Among 279 patients per matched cohort, postindex hospitalization risk was lower for SAC / VAL compared with ACEI / ARB using Kaplan-Meier estimation and unadjusted Cox models. For HF hospitalization, the hazard ratio (95% CI) was 0.56 (0.33-0.94; P=0.030). Adjusted results were similar to unadjusted. Mean ( SD ) monthly healthcare costs were lower for SAC / VAL versus ACEI / ARB for all categories except pharmacy, with hospital costs being particularly disparate between cohorts: for HF hospitalization, $248 ($1588) for SAC / VAL versus $1122 ($7290) for ACEI / ARB . The adjusted risk of incurring increased all-cause postindex costs was lower for SAC / VAL versus ACEI / ARB (cost ratio [95% CI] 0.74 [0.59-0.94]; P=0.013). Conclusions In clinical practice, patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction treated with SAC / VAL were less likely to be hospitalized than matched patients treated with ACEI / ARB . Despite higher pharmacy costs, SAC / VAL -treated patients incurred lower monthly medical and total healthcare costs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.