ReviewInternational journal of stem cells2019
Efficacies of Stem Cell Therapies for Functional Improvement of the
Review in International journal of stem cells, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
16 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 28 citations in OpenAlex.
- The Changing Landscape of Chronic Pancreatitis Research Trajectories Over Two Decades: A Global Meta-Analysis Using MeSH Terms.United European gastroenterology journal · 2026Pooled it
- Investigating the safety and efficacy of hematopoietic and mesenchymal stem cell transplantation for treatment of T1DM: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Systematic reviews · 2022Pooled it
- Therapeutic efficacy of umbilical cord-derived stem cells for diabetes mellitus: a meta-analysis study.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Pooled it
- Mesenchymal stem cell-based therapy for type 1 & 2 diabetes mellitus patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.Diabetology & metabolic syndrome · 2025Article
- Immune Evasion in Stem Cell-Based Diabetes Therapy-Current Strategies and Their Application in Clinical Trials.Biomedicines · 2025Review
- Effect of administration routes on the efficacy of human umbilical cord mesenchymal stem cells in type 2 diabetic rats.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2025Article
- The role of fetal pancreatic islet cell transplantation in the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2024Article
- Neural Stem Cell-based Regenerative Therapy: A New Approach to Diabetes Treatment.Endocrine, metabolic & immune disorders drug targets · 2024Review
- Review
- Bone marrow mesenchymal stromal cells for diabetes therapy: touch, fuse, and fix?Stem cell research & therapy · 2022Review
- Where Do We Stand in Stem Cell Therapy for the Management of Diabetes Mellitus?-A Scientometric Research Trend Analysis from 1990 to 2020.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Review
- Current treatment options and challenges in patients with Type 1 diabetes: Pharmacological, technical advances and future perspectives.Reviews in endocrine & metabolic disorders · 2021Review
- Stem Cell-Based Clinical Trials for Diabetes Mellitus.Frontiers in endocrinology · 2021Review
- Diabetes Mellitus Is a Chronic Disease that Can Benefit from Therapy with Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Current progress in stem cell therapy for type 1 diabetes mellitus.Stem cell research & therapy · 2020Review
- Need for Specialized Therapeutic Stem Cells Banks Equipped with Tumor Regression Enzymes and Anti-Tumor Genes.Journal of biomedical and allied research · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesThis study was performed to investigate whether stem cell therapy enhances
methodsA systematic search was performed from inception to January 2018 in PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases.
resultsFrom the selected final 15 articles, total of 16 trials were analyzed. There were 6 T1DM trials (total 153 cases) and 10 T2DM trials (total 457 cases). In T2DM patients, the changes in stimulated C-peptide, HbA1c, and exogenous insulin dose versus baseline showed a favorable pattern with a significant heterogeneity in stem cell therapy. In T1DM, there was no significant difference between control group and stem cell therapy group in three indicators except for HbA1c. Most of the studies were rated as having high risk of bias in the quality assessment.
conclusionsThe stem cell therapy for DM patients is not effective in T1DM but seems to be effective in improving the
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.