Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31022749›Full record

ReviewYearbook of medical informatics2019

Artificial Intelligence for Participatory Health: Applications, Impact, and Future Implications.

Kerstin Denecke, Elia Gabarron, Rebecca Grainger, Stathis Th Konstantinidis, Annie Lau, Octavio Rivera-Romero, Talya Miron-Shatz, Mark Merolli

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Yearbook of medical informatics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Artificial Intelligence and Medical Humanities.The Journal of medical humanities · 2022
    Article
  10. The Application of the Principles of Responsible AI on Social Media Marketing for Digital Health.Information systems frontiers : a journal of research and innovation · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kerstin DeneckeBern University of Applied Sciences, Bern, Switzerland.
Elia GabarronNorwegian Centre for E-health Research, University Hospital of North Norway, Norway.
Rebecca GraingerUniversity of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand.
Stathis Th KonstantinidisUniversity of Nottingham, Nottingham, UK.
Annie LauCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Australia.
Octavio Rivera-RomeroUniversidad de Sevilla, Spain.
Talya Miron-ShatzOno Academic College, Israel, and Winton Centre for Risk and Evidence Communication, Cambridge University, England.
Mark MerolliSwinburne University of Technology, and University of Melbourne, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveArtificial intelligence (AI) provides people and professionals working in the field of participatory health informatics an opportunity to derive robust insights from a variety of online sources. The objective of this paper is to identify current state of the art and application areas of AI in the context of participatory health.

methodsA search was conducted across seven databases (PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsychInfo, ACM Digital Library, IEEExplore, and SCOPUS), covering articles published since 2013. Additionally, clinical trials involving AI in participatory health contexts registered at clinicaltrials.gov were collected and analyzed.

resultsTwenty-two articles and 12 trials were selected for review. The most common application of AI in participatory health was the secondary analysis of social media data: self-reported data including patient experiences with healthcare facilities, reports of adverse drug reactions, safety and efficacy concerns about over-the-counter medications, and other perspectives on medications. Other application areas included determining which online forum threads required moderator assistance, identifying users who were likely to drop out from a forum, extracting terms used in an online forum to learn its vocabulary, highlighting contextual information that is missing from online questions and answers, and paraphrasing technical medical terms for consumers.

conclusionsWhile AI for supporting participatory health is still in its infancy, there are a number of important research priorities that should be considered for the advancement of the field. Further research evaluating the impact of AI in participatory health informatics on the psychosocial wellbeing of individuals would help in facilitating the wider acceptance of AI into the healthcare ecosystem.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceCommunity-Based Participatory ResearchWearable Electronic DevicesClinical Trials as TopicHumansMedical InformaticsSocial MediaTelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID31022749
PMCPMC6697496

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.