Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31022513›Full record

ArticleInsect biochemistry and molecular biology2019

High-resolution QTL mapping in Tetranychus urticae reveals acaricide-specific responses and common target-site resistance after selection by different METI-I acaricides.

Simon Snoeck, Andre H Kurlovs, Sabina Bajda, René Feyereisen, Robert Greenhalgh, Ernesto Villacis-Perez, Olivia Kosterlitz, Wannes Dermauw, Richard M Clark, Thomas Van Leeuwen

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Insect biochemistry and molecular biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
9.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 79 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Who IsFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 5 institutions in 5 countries.

Simon SnoeckDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: simonp.snoeck@ugent.be.
Andre H KurlovsDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; School of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. Electronic address: andre.kurlovs@ugent.be.
Sabina BajdaDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: sabina.bajda@ugent.be.
René FeyereisenDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; Department of Plant and Environmental Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Thorvaldsensvej, Copenhagen, Denmark. Electronic address: rene.feyereisen@plen.ku.dk.
Robert GreenhalghSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. Electronic address: robert.greenhalgh@utah.edu.
Ernesto Villacis-PerezInstitute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam (UvA), Science Park 904, 1908 XH, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: ernestovp85@gmail.com.
Olivia KosterlitzSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA; Present address: Department of Biology, University of Washington, 24 Kincaid Hall, Seattle, WA, 98195, USA. Electronic address: oliviakosterlit@gmail.com.
Wannes DermauwDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium. Electronic address: wannes.dermauw@ugent.be.
Richard M ClarkSchool of Biological Sciences, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA; Center for Cell and Genome Science, University of Utah, 257 South 1400 East, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. Electronic address: richard.m.clark@utah.edu.
Thomas Van LeeuwenDepartment of Plants and Crops, Faculty of Bioscience Engineering, Ghent University, Coupure links 653, 9000, Ghent, Belgium; Institute for Biodiversity and Ecosystem Dynamics (IBED), University of Amsterdam (UvA), Science Park 904, 1908 XH, Amsterdam, the Netherlands. Electronic address: Thomas.VanLeeuwen@ugent.be.
Ghent University · BEUniversity of Utah · USInstitute for Biodiversity · DEUniversity of Copenhagen · DKUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

UTAH REGIONAL CANCER CENTERP30CA042014 · NCI · UTAH STATE HIGHER EDUCATION SYSTEM--UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI Jared P Rutter · 1986 to 2026
$72.6M
TRAINING PROGRAM IN GENETICST32GM007464 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI GRUNWALD, DAVID J., STANFIELD, GILLIAN · 1985 to 2020
$6.1M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA042014NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007464
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Arthropod herbivores cause dramatic crop losses, and frequent pesticide use has led to widespread resistance in numerous species. One such species, the two-spotted spider mite, Tetranychus urticae, is an extreme generalist herbivore and a major worldwide crop pest with a history of rapidly developing resistance to acaricides. Mitochondrial Electron Transport Inhibitors of complex I (METI-Is) have been used extensively in the last 25 years to control T. urticae around the globe, and widespread resistance to each has been documented. METI-I resistance mechanisms in T. urticae are likely complex, as increased metabolism by cytochrome P450 monooxygenases as well as a target-site mutation have been linked with resistance. To identify loci underlying resistance to the METI-I acaricides fenpyroximate, pyridaben and tebufenpyrad without prior hypotheses, we crossed a highly METI-I-resistant strain of T. urticae to a susceptible one, propagated many replicated populations over multiple generations with and without selection by each compound, and performed bulked segregant analysis genetic mapping. Our results showed that while the known H92R target-site mutation was associated with resistance to each compound, a genomic region that included cytochrome P450-reductase (CPR) was associated with resistance to pyridaben and tebufenpyrad. Within CPR, a single nonsynonymous variant distinguished the resistant strain from the sensitive one. Furthermore, a genomic region linked with tebufenpyrad resistance harbored a non-canonical member of the nuclear hormone receptor 96 (NHR96) gene family. This NHR96 gene does not encode a DNA-binding domain (DBD), an uncommon feature in arthropods, and belongs to an expanded family of 47 NHR96 proteins lacking DBDs in T. urticae. Our findings suggest that although cross-resistance to METI-Is involves known detoxification pathways, structural differences in METI-I acaricides have also resulted in resistance mechanisms that are compound-specific.

Indexed as

AcaricidesAnimalsChromosome MappingDrug ResistanceFemaleQuantitative Trait LociSelection, GeneticTetranychidaeAcaricides

Identifiers

PMID31022513
PMCPMC12991185
OpenAlexW2940561751

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.