Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31022325›Full record

ArticlePlant biotechnology journal2019

Genome of 'Charleston Gray', the principal American watermelon cultivar, and genetic characterization of 1,365 accessions in the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System watermelon collection.

Shan Wu, Xin Wang, Umesh Reddy, Honghe Sun, Kan Bao, Lei Gao, Linyong Mao, Takshay Patel, Carlos Ortiz, Venkata L Abburi and 23 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plant biotechnology journal, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 68 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
68citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

68 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

8 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

33 authors.

Shan WuBoyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Xin WangBoyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Umesh ReddyDepartment of Biology, West Virginia State University, Institute, WV, USA.
Honghe SunBoyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Kan BaoBoyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Lei GaoBoyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Linyong MaoBoyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.
Takshay PatelHorticultural Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Carlos OrtizDepartment of Biology, West Virginia State University, Institute, WV, USA.
Venkata L AbburiDepartment of Biology, West Virginia State University, Institute, WV, USA.
Padma NimmakayalaDepartment of Biology, West Virginia State University, Institute, WV, USA.
Sandra BranhamU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC, USA.
Pat WechterU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC, USA.
Laura MasseyU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC, USA.
Kai-Shu LingU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC, USA.
Chandrasekar KousikU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC, USA.
Sue A HammarDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Yaakov TadmorDepartment of Vegetable Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay, Israel.
Vitaly PortnoyDepartment of Vegetable Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay, Israel.
Amit GurDepartment of Vegetable Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay, Israel.
Nurit KatzirDepartment of Vegetable Research, Agricultural Research Organization, Newe Ya'ar Research Center, Ramat Yishay, Israel.
Nihat GunerSakata Seed America, Fort Myers, FL, USA.
Angela DavisSakata Seed America, Woodland Research Station, Woodland, CA, USA.
Alvaro G HernandezRoy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Chris L WrightRoy J. Carver Biotechnology Center, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL, USA.
Cecilia McGregorDepartment of Horticulture, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, USA.
Robert JarretU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, Plant Genetic Resources Conservation Unit, Griffin, GA, USA.
Xingping ZhangSyngenta Beijing Innovation Center, Beijing, China.
Yong XuNational Engineering Research Center for Vegetables, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Horticultural Crops (North China), Beijing, China.
Todd C WehnerHorticultural Science Department, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC, USA.
Rebecca GrumetDepartment of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI, USA.
Amnon LeviU.S. Department of Agriculture-Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Vegetable Laboratory, Charleston, SC, USA.
Zhangjun FeiBoyce Thompson Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, USA.ORCID 0000-0001-9684-1450

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Years of selection for desirable fruit quality traits in dessert watermelon (Citrullus lanatus) has resulted in a narrow genetic base in modern cultivars. Development of novel genomic and genetic resources offers great potential to expand genetic diversity and improve important traits in watermelon. Here, we report a high-quality genome sequence of watermelon cultivar 'Charleston Gray', a principal American dessert watermelon, to complement the existing reference genome from '97103', an East Asian cultivar. Comparative analyses between genomes of 'Charleston Gray' and '97103' revealed genomic variants that may underlie phenotypic differences between the two cultivars. We then genotyped 1365 watermelon plant introduction (PI) lines maintained at the U.S. National Plant Germplasm System using genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS). These PI lines were collected throughout the world and belong to three Citrullus species, C. lanatus, C. mucosospermus and C. amarus. Approximately 25 000 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were derived from the GBS data using the 'Charleston Gray' genome as the reference. Population genomic analyses using these SNPs discovered a close relationship between C. lanatus and C. mucosospermus and identified four major groups in these two species correlated to their geographic locations. Citrullus amarus was found to have a distinct genetic makeup compared to C. lanatus and C. mucosospermus. The SNPs also enabled identification of genomic regions associated with important fruit quality and disease resistance traits through genome-wide association studies. The high-quality 'Charleston Gray' genome and the genotyping data of this large collection of watermelon accessions provide valuable resources for facilitating watermelon research, breeding and improvement.

Indexed as

Genome, PlantChromosome MappingCitrullusDisease ResistanceFruitGenetic Association StudiesGenomicsPolymorphism, Single Nucleotide‘Charleston Gray’Citrullus germplasmdisease resistancegenetic diversitygenome sequencegenome-wide association studygenotyping-by-sequencingwatermelon

Identifiers

PMID31022325
PMCPMC6835170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.