ArticlePloS one2019
Optimization of DNA extraction from human urinary samples for mycobiome community profiling.
Article in PloS one, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
28 citing papers in PubMed.
- Performance of an affordable urine self-sampling method for human papillomavirus detection in Mexican women.PloS one · 2021Trial
- Analytical validation of a highly accurate and reliable next-generation sequencing-based urine assay.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- A rapid ionic liquid-based DNA extraction method for molecular diagnostics of urinary tract infections.Microbiology spectrum · 2026Article
- Non-invasive comparative study of HLA genotyping between urinary and blood DNA using sequencing-based typing and third-generation sequencing.Advances in laboratory medicine · 2026Article
- Variations in Urinary Microbiota on a Short-Duration Space Mission to the International Space Station.JU open plus · 2026Article
- Methodological bias shapes the interpretation of the urinary microbiome in low-biomass systems.Frontiers in microbiology · 2026Review
- Optimizing extraction of microbial DNA from urine: Advancing urinary microbiome research in bladder cancer.Investigative and clinical urology · 2025Article
- Short- and mid-term temporal variability of the human urinary microbiota: a prospective observational cohort study.BMC microbiology · 2025Observational
- Unraveling the impact of host genetics and factors on the urinary microbiome in a young population.mBio · 2024Article
- Culture and amplification-free nanopore sequencing for rapid detection of pathogens and antimicrobial resistance genes from urine.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024Article
- Exploring Condition-Specific Variability in the Ureteral Stent Microbiome.Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Korean urobiome platform (KUROM) study for acute uncomplicated sporadic versus recurrent cystitis in women: Clinical significance.Investigative and clinical urology · 2024Article
- Synthesis of current pediatric urinary microbiome research.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Review
- Rapid metagenomic sequencing for diagnosis and antimicrobial sensitivity prediction of canine bacterial infections.Microbial genomics · 2023Article
- Review
- Next-Generation Sequencing Applications for the Study of Fungal Pathogens.Microorganisms · 2022Review
- Determination of the Optimal Bacterial DNA Extraction Method to Explore the Urinary Microbiota.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Article
- A Novel Propidium Monoazide-Based PCR Assay Can Measure Viable UropathogenicFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Comparison Analysis of Different DNA Extraction Methods on Suitability for Long-Read Metagenomic Nanopore Sequencing.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2022Article
- Urobiome: An outlook on the metagenome of urological diseases.Investigative and clinical urology · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
introductionRecent data suggest the urinary tract hosts a microbial community of varying composition, even in the absence of infection. Culture-independent methodologies, such as next-generation sequencing of conserved ribosomal DNA sequences, provide an expansive look at these communities, identifying both common commensals and fastidious organisms. A fundamental challenge has been the isolation of DNA representative of the entire resident microbial community, including fungi. MATERIALS AND
methodsWe evaluated multiple modifications of commonly-used DNA extraction procedures using standardized male and female urine samples, comparing resulting overall, fungal and bacterial DNA yields by quantitative PCR. After identifying protocol modifications that increased DNA yields (lyticase/lysozyme digestion, bead beating, boil/freeze cycles, proteinase K treatment, and carrier DNA use), all modifications were combined for systematic confirmation of optimal protocol conditions. This optimized protocol was tested against commercially available methodologies to compare overall and microbial DNA yields, community representation and diversity by next-generation sequencing (NGS).
resultsOverall and fungal-specific DNA yields from standardized urine samples demonstrated that microbial abundances differed significantly among the eight methods used. Methodologies that included multiple disruption steps, including enzymatic, mechanical, and thermal disruption and proteinase digestion, particularly in combination with small volume processing and pooling steps, provided more comprehensive representation of the range of bacterial and fungal species. Concentration of larger volume urine specimens at low speed centrifugation proved highly effective, increasing resulting DNA levels and providing greater microbial representation and diversity.
conclusionsAlterations in the methodology of urine storage, preparation, and DNA processing improve microbial community profiling using culture-independent sequencing methods. Our optimized protocol for DNA extraction from urine samples provided improved fungal community representation. Use of this technique resulted in equivalent representation of the bacterial populations as well, making this a useful technique for the concurrent evaluation of bacterial and fungal populations by NGS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.