Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31022180›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2019

Chemical features mining provides new descriptive structure-odor relationships.

Carmen C Licon, Guillaume Bosc, Mohammed Sabri, Marylou Mantel, Arnaud Fournel, Caroline Bushdid, Jerome Golebiowski, Celine Robardet, Marc Plantevit, Mehdi Kaytoue and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Data-Driven Elucidation of Flavor Chemistry.Journal of agricultural and food chemistry · 2023
    Review
  7. Article
  8. A Perspective on Explanations of Molecular Prediction Models.Journal of chemical theory and computation · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 4 countries.

Carmen C LiconLyon Neuroscience Research Center, University Lyon, CNRS UMR5292, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9053-9832
Guillaume BoscINSA Lyon, CNRS, LIRIS UMR5205, France.ORCID 0000-0003-2858-7926
Mohammed SabriLyon Neuroscience Research Center, University Lyon, CNRS UMR5292, France.
Marylou MantelLyon Neuroscience Research Center, University Lyon, CNRS UMR5292, France.
Arnaud FournelLyon Neuroscience Research Center, University Lyon, CNRS UMR5292, France.ORCID 0000-0002-4344-1987
Caroline BushdidInstitute of Chemistry of Nice, UMR CNRS 7272, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.
Jerome GolebiowskiInstitute of Chemistry of Nice, UMR CNRS 7272, Université Côte d'Azur, Nice, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3675-1952
Celine RobardetINSA Lyon, CNRS, LIRIS UMR5205, France.ORCID 0000-0002-8583-9408
Marc PlantevitUniversité Lyon 1, CNRS, LIRIS UMR5205, France.ORCID 0000-0003-4636-5753
Mehdi KaytoueINSA Lyon, CNRS, LIRIS UMR5205, France.ORCID 0000-0002-1569-5242
Moustafa BensafiLyon Neuroscience Research Center, University Lyon, CNRS UMR5292, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2991-3036
Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1 · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

An important goal in researching the biology of olfaction is to link the perception of smells to the chemistry of odorants. In other words, why do some odorants smell like fruits and others like flowers? While the so-called stimulus-percept issue was resolved in the field of color vision some time ago, the relationship between the chemistry and psycho-biology of odors remains unclear up to the present day. Although a series of investigations have demonstrated that this relationship exists, the descriptive and explicative aspects of the proposed models that are currently in use require greater sophistication. One reason for this is that the algorithms of current models do not consistently consider the possibility that multiple chemical rules can describe a single quality despite the fact that this is the case in reality, whereby two very different molecules can evoke a similar odor. Moreover, the available datasets are often large and heterogeneous, thus rendering the generation of multiple rules without any use of a computational approach overly complex. We considered these two issues in the present paper. First, we built a new database containing 1689 odorants characterized by physicochemical properties and olfactory qualities. Second, we developed a computational method based on a subgroup discovery algorithm that discriminated perceptual qualities of smells on the basis of physicochemical properties. Third, we ran a series of experiments on 74 distinct olfactory qualities and showed that the generation and validation of rules linking chemistry to odor perception was possible. Taken together, our findings provide significant new insights into the relationship between stimulus and percept in olfaction. In addition, by automatically extracting new knowledge linking chemistry of odorants and psychology of smells, our results provide a new computational framework of analysis enabling scientists in the field to test original hypotheses using descriptive or predictive modeling.

Indexed as

Databases, ChemicalOdorantsAlgorithmsChemical PhenomenaComputational BiologyHumansModels, MolecularOlfactory PerceptionStructure-Activity Relationship

Identifiers

PMID31022180
PMCPMC6504111
OpenAlexW2941455519

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.