Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31022175›Full record

SynthesisPLoS neglected tropical diseases2019

Trends in dengue research in the Philippines: A systematic review.

Kristal An Agrupis, Michelle Ylade, Josephine Aldaba, Anna Lena Lopez, Jacqueline Deen

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kristal An AgrupisInstitute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Michelle YladeInstitute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Josephine AldabaInstitute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Anna Lena LopezInstitute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.
Jacqueline DeenInstitute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health, University of the Philippines, Manila, Philippines.ORCID 0000-0001-8875-5026

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dengue is an important public health problem in the Philippines. We sought to describe the trends in dengue research in the country. We searched four databases and identified published studies on dengue research in the Philippines during the past 60 years. We reviewed 135 eligible studies, of which 33% were descriptive epidemiologic studies or case series, 16% were entomologic or vector control studies, 12% were studies on dengue virology and serologic response, 10% were socio-behavioral and economics studies, 8% were clinical trials, 7% were on burden of disease, 7% were investigations on markers of disease severity, 5% were on dengue diagnostics, and 2% were modeling studies. During the last decade, dengue research in the Philippines has increased and evolved from simple descriptive studies to those with more complex and diverse designs. We identified several key topics where more research would be useful.

Indexed as

AedesAnimalsBiomedical ResearchDengueDengue VirusDisease ManagementDisease Transmission, InfectiousHumansMosquito ControlPhilippines

Identifiers

PMID31022175
PMCPMC6483330

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.