Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31021855›Full record

ArticleThe American journal of surgical pathology2019

Mucoepidermoid Carcinoma: A Comparison of Histologic Grading Systems and Relationship to MAML2 Rearrangement and Prognosis.

Nicole A Cipriani, Jonathan J Lusardi, James McElherne, Alexander T Pearson, Andrea D Olivas, Carrie Fitzpatrick, Mark W Lingen, Elizabeth A Blair

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in The American journal of surgical pathology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Epidemiology, prognosis, and treatment of head and neck mucoepidermoid carcinoma: a SEER-based analysis of 6228 patients (2004-2020).European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Unilocular cystic mucoepidermoid carcinoma: 6 cases reported and literature review.International journal of clinical and experimental pathology · 2025
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Nicole A CiprianiDepartment of Pathology.
Jonathan J LusardiNorthwest Otolaryngology, Bridgeton, MO.
James McElherneDepartment of Pathology.
Alexander T PearsonDepartment of Internal Medicine, Section of Hematology/Oncology.
Andrea D OlivasDepartment of Pathology.
Carrie FitzpatrickDepartment of Pathology.
Mark W LingenDepartment of Pathology.
Elizabeth A BlairDepartment of Surgery, Section of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery, The University of Chicago Medicine, Chicago, IL.

Funding

A reasoned approach to combination therapy development in head and neck cancerK08DE026500 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI PEARSON, ALEXANDER THOMAS · 2016 to 2020
$800k
NIDCR NIH HHS K08 DE026500
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mucoepidermoid carcinoma (MEC) is the most common salivary gland malignancy, but categorization is complicated by variability in grading systems and uncertain prognostic significance of MAML2 rearrangement. The aims of this study were to determine the prognostic significance of MEC grading systems and MAML2 rearrangement status. Fifty-three carcinomas originally diagnosed as MEC (45 primary; 8 recurrent) of major and minor salivary glands were graded according to modified Healey, Brandwein, AFIP, and Katabi systems. Fluorescence in situ hybridization for MAML2 rearrangement was performed. Clinical features and outcomes were recorded. Twenty-five (47%) carcinomas scored the same in all grading systems. The most common histologic feature leading to a diagnosis of intermediate grade was isolated solid growth. Brandwein assigned the highest percentage of high grade (29%) and AFIP the highest percentage of low grade (80%). MAML2 was rearranged in 37/46 (80%) cases. Forty-three (81%) were morphologically compatible with MEC, and these were more likely to be low-intermediate grade and MAML2-rearranged. Of primary carcinomas, 6 (13%) recurred. Statistically significant univariate risk factors for recurrence included non-MEC morphology, stage T4, and high Brandwein grade. Margin status, MAML2 rearrangement, and isolated solid growth were not predictive of recurrence. A binary grading system (Brandwein high vs. low-plus-intermediate) could be considered to better reflect biological behavior in MEC. Our study confirms that MAML2 wildtype tumors more likely represent high grade non-MECs, and prior studies demonstrating worse prognosis in MAML2-nonrearranged MECs may be diluted by high-grade non-MECs.

Indexed as

Gene RearrangementAdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overBiomarkers, TumorCarcinoma, MucoepidermoidChildFemaleGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansIn Situ Hybridization, FluorescenceMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm GradingNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalBiomarkers, TumorMAML2 protein, humanTrans-Activators

Identifiers

PMID31021855
PMCPMC6629427

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.