ArticleIEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering2019
Conceptual Intra-Cardiac Electrode Configurations That Facilitate Directional Cardiac Stimulation for Optimal Electrotherapy.
Article in IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- A smoothed boundary bidomain model for cardiac simulations in anatomically detailed geometries.PloS one · 2023Article
- An in-silico assessment of efficacy of two novel intra-cardiac electrode configurations versus traditional anti-tachycardia pacing therapy for terminating sustained ventricular tachycardia.Computers in biology and medicine · 2021Article
- Computational Model for Therapy Optimization of Wearable Cardioverter Defibrillator: Shockable Rhythm Detection and Optimal Electrotherapy.Frontiers in physiology · 2021Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveElectrotherapy remains the most effective direct therapy against lethal cardiac arrhythmias. When an arrhythmic event is sensed, either strong electric shocks or controlled rapid pacing is automatically applied directly to the heart via an implanted cardioverter defibrillator (ICDs). Despite their success, ICDs remain a highly non-optimal therapy: the strong shocks required for defibrillation cause significant extra-cardiac stimulation, resulting in pain and long-term tissue damage, and can also limit battery life. When used in anti-tachycardia pacing mode, ICDs are also often ineffective, as the pacing electrode can be far away from the centre of the arrhythmia, making it hard for the paced wave to interrupt and terminate it.
methodsIn this paper, we present two conceptual intra-cardiac directional electrode configurations in silico based on novel arrangements of pairs of positive-negative electrodes. Both configurations have the potential to cause preferential excitation on specific regions of the heart.
resultsWe demonstrate how the properties of the induced field varies spatially around the electrodes and how it depends upon the specific arrangements of dipole electrode pairs. The results show that when tested within anatomically-realistic rabbit ventricular models, both electrode configurations produce strong virtual electrodes on the targeted endocardial surfaces, with weaker virtual electrodes produced elsewhere.
conclusionsThe proposed electrode configurations may facilitate targeted far-field anti-tachycardia pacing and/or defibrillation, which may be useful in cases where conventional anti-tachycardia pacing fails. In addition, the conceptual electrode designs intrinsically confine the electric field to the immediate vicinity of the electrodes, and may, thus, minimize pain due to unnecessary extra-cardiac stimulation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.