Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31021400›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2019

Pleiotropy informed adaptive association test of multiple traits using genome-wide association study summary data.

Maria Masotti, Bin Guo, Baolin Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Maria MasottiDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
Bin GuoDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0002-9124-1955
Baolin WuDivision of Biostatistics, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.ORCID 0000-0001-6676-0422

Funding

Statistical Model Building for High Dimensional Biomedical DataR01GM083345 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WU, BAOLIN · 2008 to 2011
$1.0M
Biostatistics in Genetics and Genomics Training ProgramT32GM108557 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI PAN, WEI · 2014 to 2018
$583k
Statistical methods for large-scale significance and prediction analysis with appR01CA134848 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI WU, BAOLIN · 2009 to 2010
$291k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA134848NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM083345NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM108557
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Genetic variants associated with disease outcomes can be used to develop personalized treatment. To reach this precision medicine goal, hundreds of large-scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) have been conducted in the past decade to search for promising genetic variants associated with various traits. They have successfully identified tens of thousands of disease-related variants. However, in total these identified variants explain only part of the variation for most complex traits. There remain many genetic variants with small effect sizes to be discovered, which calls for the development of (a) GWAS with more samples and more comprehensively genotyped variants, for example, the NHLBI Trans-Omics for Precision Medicine (TOPMed) Program is planning to conduct whole genome sequencing on over 100 000 individuals; and (b) novel and more powerful statistical analysis methods. The current dominating GWAS analysis approach is the "single trait" association test, despite the fact that many GWAS are conducted in deeply phenotyped cohorts including many correlated and well-characterized outcomes, which can help improve the power to detect novel variants if properly analyzed, as suggested by increasing evidence that pleiotropy, where a genetic variant affects multiple traits, is the norm in genome-phenome associations. We aim to develop pleiotropy informed powerful association test methods across multiple traits for GWAS. Since it is generally very hard to access individual-level GWAS phenotype and genotype data for those existing GWAS, due to privacy concerns and various logistical considerations, we develop rigorous statistical methods for pleiotropy informed adaptive multitrait association test methods that need only summary association statistics publicly available from most GWAS. We first develop a pleiotropy test, which has powerful performance for truly pleiotropic variants but is sensitive to the pleiotropy assumption. We then develop a pleiotropy informed adaptive test that has robust and powerful performance under various genetic models. We develop accurate and efficient numerical algorithms to compute the analytical P-value for the proposed adaptive test without the need of resampling or permutation. We illustrate the performance of proposed methods through application to joint association test of GWAS meta-analysis summary data for several glycemic traits. Our proposed adaptive test identified several novel loci missed by individual trait based GWAS meta-analysis. All the proposed methods are implemented in a publicly available R package.

Indexed as

Genetic PleiotropyGenome-Wide Association StudyAlgorithmsGenetic Association StudiesGenetic VariationHumansModels, StatisticalPhenotypeadaptive association testgenome-wide association studiesglycemic traitsmeta-analysispleiotropy

Identifiers

PMID31021400
PMCPMC6814451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.