Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31021382›Full record

ArticleJAMA ophthalmology2019

Cost and Visit Duration of Same-Day Access at an Academic Ophthalmology Department vs Emergency Department.

Eric L Singman, Kerry Smith, Radhika Mehta, Michael V Boland, Divya Srikumaran, Kevin Frick, Lynne Young, Gina Locco, Jing Tian, Cathy Kowalewski and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA ophthalmology, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Eric L SingmanWilmer General Eye Services, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kerry SmithDepartment of Ophthalmology, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Radhika MehtaAdministrations Department, The Johns Hopkins Hospital, Baltimore, Maryland.
Michael V BolandDivision of Health Sciences Informatics, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Divya SrikumaranWilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Kevin FrickDepartment of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Carey Business School, Baltimore, Maryland.
Lynne YoungWilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Gina LoccoOphthalmology Registration, Johns Hopkins School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jing TianBiostatistics Consulting Center, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
Cathy KowalewskiWilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Peter McDonnellWilmer Eye Institute, Baltimore, Maryland.
Johns Hopkins University · USNational Eye Institute · USJohns Hopkins Hospital · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Convenient outpatient access for ophthalmology patients seeking urgent care could offer savings compared with an emergency department (ED) visit. Objective: To evaluate the costs and visit durations of same-day access (SDA) in an ophthalmology department at an academic medical center vs ED care. Design, Setting, and Participants: This single-center study was a retrospective quality improvement analysis of an institutional electronic medical record system at the Wilmer Eye Institute clinics and the Johns Hopkins Hospital ED. On June 1, 2015, the Wilmer Eye Institute and Johns Hopkins Hospital initiated an official policy of providing SDA to patients calling for appointments (ie, the same-day project). All ophthalmology clinic locations created same-day appointment slots for at least 1 practitioner. In recognition of seasonal variations in patient visit volumes, the 10 months before implementation (August 1, 2014, to May 31, 2015) were compared with complementary periods in 2015 to 2016 and 2016 to 2017. Main Outcomes and Measures: The study tabulated encounters, charges, and visit length for outpatients seen on the same day or by previously scheduled appointments. For the ED patients, volume, diagnoses, charges, and length of stay data were collected. The numbers of SDA patients who indicated urgency were tabulated. Results: The number of SDA patients increased from 22 781 to 26 579 for the first year after SDA implementation. The mean charge was $258 (95% CI, $250-$266; median, $184; interquartile range [IQR], $175-$320), and the mean clinic transit time was 1.55 hours (95% CI, 1.54-1.57 hours; median, 1.28 hours). For patients seeking eye care in the ED, the mean professional fee was $401 (95% CI, $390-$411; median, $360; IQR, $255-$500), the mean (SD) total hospital charge was $1040 ($999) (95% CI, $729-$1079; median, $1002; IQR, $334-$1429), and the mean length of stay was 7.30 hours (95% CI, 7.01-7.57 hours; median, 7.20 hours). The top 4 ophthalmic diagnoses for ED patients were conjunctivitis, cornea abrasion, iritis, and visual loss, which were unchanged after SDA implementation. In calendar year 2017, a total of 4062 SDA patients reported urgency; their estimated savings in charges compared with an ED visit were $580 866 in professional fees and $3 176 484 in hospital charges. Conclusions and Relevance: Same-day access appears to be less expensive and to require less time in the health care system than a visit to the ED for an ophthalmic diagnosis. Substantial savings in time and money might be achieved if urgent eye care is delivered in the clinic rather than the ED.

Indexed as

Health Care CostsAcademic Medical CentersAdultAmbulatory Care FacilitiesEmergency Service, HospitalEye DiseasesFemaleHealth Services AccessibilityHumansLength of StayMaleMiddle AgedOphthalmologyRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID31021382
PMCPMC6488008
OpenAlexW2942443797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.