Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31021327›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical Internet research2019

Clinicians' Concerns About Mobile Ecological Momentary Assessment Tools Designed for Emerging Psychiatric Problems: Prospective Acceptability Assessment of the MEmind App.

Christophe Lemey, Mark Erik Larsen, Jordan Devylder, Philippe Courtet, Romain Billot, Philippe Lenca, Michel Walter, Enrique Baca-García, Sofian Berrouiguet

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical Internet research, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Emotion detection for supporting depression screening.Multimedia tools and applications · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Christophe LemeyEA 7479 SPURBO, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-7308-7958
Mark Erik LarsenBlack Dog Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0272-2053
Jordan DevylderGraduate School of Social Service, Fordham University, New York, NY, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-5873-4582
Philippe CourtetInserm U1061, La colombière Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.ORCID 0000-0002-6519-8586
Romain BillotIMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC, F-29238 Brest, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-2614-3822
Philippe LencaIMT Atlantique, Lab-STICC, F-29238 Brest, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0001-5014-2347
Michel WalterEA 7479 SPURBO, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0002-3071-7673
Enrique Baca-GarcíaCarlos III Institute Of Health, CIBERSAM (Centro de Investigation en Salud Mental), Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-6963-6555
Sofian BerrouiguetEA 7479 SPURBO, Université de Bretagne Occidentale, Brest, France.ORCID 0000-0001-9148-6218

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundMany mental disorders are preceded by a prodromal phase consisting of various attenuated and unspecific symptoms and functional impairment. Electronic health records are generally used to capture these symptoms during medical consultation. Internet and mobile technologies provide the opportunity to monitor symptoms emerging in patients' environments using ecological momentary assessment techniques to support preventive therapeutic decision making.

objectiveThe objective of this study was to assess the acceptability of a Web-based app designed to collect medical data during appointments and provide ecological momentary assessment features.

methodsWe recruited clinicians at 4 community psychiatry departments in France to participate. They used the app to assess patients and to collect data after viewing a video of a young patient's emerging psychiatric consultation. We then asked them to answer a short anonymous self-administered questionnaire that evaluated their experience, the acceptability of the app, and their habit of using new technologies.

resultsOf 24 practitioners invited, 21 (88%) agreed to participate. Most of them were between 25 and 45 years old, and greater age was not associated with poorer acceptability. Most of the practitioners regularly used new technologies, and 95% (20/21) connected daily to the internet, with 70% (15/21) connecting 3 times a day or more. However, only 57% (12/21) reported feeling comfortable with computers. Of the clinicians, 86% (18/21) would recommend the tool to their colleagues and 67% (14/21) stated that they would be interested in daily use of the app. Most of the clinicians (16/21, 76%) found the interface easy to use and useful. However, several clinicians noted the lack of readability (8/21, 38%) and the need to improve ergonometric features (4/21, 19%), in particular to facilitate browsing through various subsections. Some participants (5/21, 24%) were concerned about the storage of medical data and most of them (11/21, 52%) seemed to be uncomfortable with this.

conclusionsWe describe the first step of the development of a Web app combining an electronic health record and ecological momentary assessment features. This online tool offers the possibility to assess patients and to integrate medical data easily into face-to-face conditions. The acceptability of this app supports the feasibility of its broader implementation. This app could help to standardize assessment and to build up a strong database. Used in conjunction with robust data mining analytic techniques, such a database would allow exploration of risk factors, patterns of symptom evolution, and identification of distinct risk subgroups.

Indexed as

AdultEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMental DisordersMiddle AgedProspective Studiesacceptabilitydecision support systems, clinicalecological momentary assessmentfeasibility studiesinternetmental healthmobile applicationsoutpatientsprodromal symptomsyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID31021327
PMCPMC6658238

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.