ArticleThe CRISPR journal2018
TIE: A Method to Electroporate Long DNA Templates into Preimplantation Embryos for CRISPR-Cas9 Gene Editing.
Article in The CRISPR journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- CRISPR/Cas9-editing of PRNP in Alpine goats.Veterinary research · 2025Article
- Efficient genome editing of two-cell mouse embryos via modified CRISPR/Cas electroporation.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Recent Advances in the Production of Genome-Edited Rats.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Electroporation-Mediated Genome Editing of Livestock Zygotes.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Precise genome editing using CRISPR typically requires delivery of guide RNAs, Cas9 endonuclease, and DNA repair templates. Both microinjection and electroporation effectively deliver these components into mouse zygotes provided the DNA template is an oligonucleotide of only a few hundred base pairs. However, electroporation completely fails with longer double-stranded DNAs leaving microinjection as the only delivery option. Here, we overcome this limitation by first injecting all CRISPR components, including long plasmid-sized DNA templates, into the sub-zona pellucida space. There they are retained, supporting subsequent electroporation. We show that this simple and well-tolerated method achieves intracellular reagent concentrations sufficient to effect precise gene edits.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.