Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31021201›Full record

ArticleThe CRISPR journal2018

CRISPRdisco: An Automated Pipeline for the Discovery and Analysis of CRISPR-Cas Systems.

Alexandra B Crawley, James R Henriksen, Rodolphe Barrangou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The CRISPR journal, 2018. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 56 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
56citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

56 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Occurrence and applications of CRISPR-Cas systems in bifidobacteria.Applied and environmental microbiology · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. CRISPR-Cas9 and Its Bioinformatics Tools: A Systematic Review.Current issues in molecular biology · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Characterization of diverse Cas9 orthologs for genome and epigenome editing.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  9. Genomic diversity and functional adaptation ofFrontiers in microbiology · 2025
    Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alexandra B Crawley1 Department of Food, Bioprocessing, and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina.
James R Henriksen2 AgBiome , Durham, North Carolina.
Rodolphe Barrangou1 Department of Food, Bioprocessing, and Nutrition Sciences, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

CRISPR-Cas adaptive immune systems of bacteria and archaea have catapulted into the scientific spotlight as genome editing tools. To aid researchers in the field, we have developed an automated pipeline, named CRISPRdisco (CRISPR discovery), to identify CRISPR repeats and

Identifiers

PMID31021201
PMCPMC6636876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.