Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31021150›Full record

ArticleJournal of experimental psychology. General2019

Intrusive memories and voluntary memory of a trauma film: Differential effects of a cognitive interference task after encoding.

Alex Lau-Zhu, Richard N Henson, Emily A Holmes

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of experimental psychology. General, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Neurofeedback: Applications, advancements, and future directions.PCN reports : psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2025
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Alex Lau-ZhuMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit.ORCID 0000-0001-5055-8617
Richard N HensonMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit.
Emily A HolmesMedical Research Council Cognition and Brain Sciences Unit.

Funding

Cambridge CommonwealthEuropean and International TrustMedical Research Council MC_U105579226Medical Research Council MC_UP_0901/1Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/15Medical Research Council MC_UU_00005/8Medical Research Council; Intramural Programme
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Methods to reduce intrusive memories (e.g., of traumatic events) should ideally spare voluntary memory for the same event (e.g., to report on the event in court). Single-trace memory accounts assume that interfering with a trace should impact both its involuntary and voluntary expressions, whereas separate-trace accounts assume these two can dissociate, allowing for

Indexed as

AdultFemaleHumansImaginationMaleMemory ConsolidationMental RecallMiddle AgedPsychological TraumaRecognition, PsychologyStress Disorders, Post-TraumaticVolitionYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID31021150
PMCPMC7116494

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.