Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31021136›Full record

SynthesisPsychological bulletin2019

The impact of affective information on working memory: A pair of meta-analytic reviews of behavioral and neuroimaging evidence.

Susanne Schweizer, Ajay B Satpute, Shir Atzil, Andy P Field, Caitlin Hitchcock, Melissa Black, Lisa Feldman Barrett, Tim Dalgleish

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Psychological bulletin, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 74 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
74citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

74 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Contributions of the basolateral amygdala and nucleus accumbens to sustaining not just initiating cognitive effort.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  8. Social working memory in adolescence.Child development · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

14 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Susanne SchweizerInstitute of Cognitive Neuroscience.ORCID 0000-0001-6153-8291
Ajay B SatputeDepartment of Psychology.
Shir AtzilDepartment of Psychology.
Andy P FieldSchool of Psychology.
Caitlin HitchcockMedical Research Council.ORCID 0000-0002-2435-0713
Melissa BlackMedical Research Council.
Lisa Feldman BarrettAthinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging.
Tim DalgleishMedical Research Council.ORCID 0000-0002-7304-2231

Funding

Medical Research CouncilMedical Research Council MC_US_A060_0019Wellcome Trust 209127/Z/17/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Everyday life is defined by goal states that are continuously reprioritized based on available, often affective information. To pursue these goals, individuals need to process and maintain goal-relevant information, while ignoring potentially salient information that distracts resources from these goals. Empirically, this ability has typically been operationalized as working memory (WM) capacity. A growing body of research is investigating the impact of information's affective salience on WM capacity. In the present review we address this question by exploring the potential differential impact of affective compared with neutral information on WM, and the underlying neural substrates. One-hundred and 65 studies (

Indexed as

NeuroimagingAffectFrontal LobeHumansMemory, Short-TermNerve NetParietal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID31021136
PMCPMC6526745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.