ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2019
Kidney Transplant Evaluation: Inferences from Qualitative Interviews with African American Patients and their Providers.
Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.
- Regional Variation in Early Kidney Transplant Access Across Dialysis Facilities in 4 US Regions.Kidney international reports · 2026Article
- Disentangling Dialysis Facility and Transplant Center Factors on Evaluation Start Following Referral for Kidney Transplantation: A Regional Study in the United States.Kidney medicine · 2025Article
- Disparities Persist Among Hispanic Patients: Completing Evaluation, Waitlisting, and Receiving a Kidney Transplant.Transplantation direct · 2024Article
- Predicting Kidney Transplant Evaluation Non-attendance.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2024Article
- European Society for Organ Transplantation (ESOT) Consensus Statement on Outcome Measures in Liver Transplantation According to Value-Based Health Care.Transplant international : official journal of the European Society for Organ Transplantation · 2023Article
- Nephrologists' Perspectives on Gender Disparities in CKD and Dialysis.Kidney international reports · 2022Article
- Non-medical barriers in access to early steps of kidney transplantation in the United States - A scoping review.Transplantation reviews (Orlando, Fla.) · 2021Article
- Kidney Transplant Evaluation and Listing: Development and Preliminary Evaluation of Multimedia Education for Patients.Annals of transplantation · 2021Article
- An opt-out model for kidney transplant referral: The time has come.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021Article
- Educational Animations to Inform Transplant Candidates About Deceased Donor Kidney Options: An Efficacy Randomized Trial.Transplantation direct · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCompleting pre-transplant evaluation is often a barrier to kidney waiting list placement among African American (AA) patients. Interventions are needed to provide AAs with culturally sensitive, understandable information that increases their capacity to achieve placement on the kidney transplant waiting list. Research about enabling and constraining factors for patients to complete the waitlisting process is necessary to inform such interventions; however, few such studies have been conducted specific to AA patient needs.
methodsSemistructured qualitative focus groups and interviews were conducted with 24 AA listed or transplanted patients (along with their caregivers when available) and 14 transplant providers to explore thoughts, feelings, and assumptions about transplant evaluation. Questions also probed participants' perceptions of enabling and constraining factors to wait-listing. Interviews were recorded and transcribed and inductive thematic analysis was performed to inform message content for a future educational video intervention.
resultsThree themes emerged from thematic content analysis: (1) transplant center support in navigating steps to wait-listing, (2) provider attitude and messaging, and (3) education about evaluation and the waiting list. Enabling factors for evaluation completion included staff assistance with completing testing, frequent communication, and positive staff messaging. Constraining factors were staff inaccessibility, patient scheduling difficulties, and misunderstanding/misinformation regarding the role of the transplant coordinator, process of and requirements for listing, and understanding allocation.
conclusionsWe identified information based on patients' expressed needs and experiences managing evaluation completion. These findings are valuable in efforts going forward to empower AAs to achieve placement on the waiting list.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.