Evidence map›Paper›PMID 31020606›Full record

ArticleJournal of racial and ethnic health disparities2019

Kidney Transplant Evaluation: Inferences from Qualitative Interviews with African American Patients and their Providers.

Natalia Crenesse-Cozien, Beth Dolph, Meriem Said, Thomas H Feeley, Liise K Kayler

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of racial and ethnic health disparities, 2019. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Predicting Kidney Transplant Evaluation Non-attendance.Journal of clinical psychology in medical settings · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. An opt-out model for kidney transplant referral: The time has come.American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons · 2021
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Natalia Crenesse-CozienJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Beth DolphJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Meriem SaidTransplant and Kidney Care Regional Center of Excellence, Erie County Medical Center, 462 Grider Street, Buffalo, NY, 14215, USA.
Thomas H FeeleyDepartment of Communication, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA.
Liise K KaylerJacobs School of Medicine and Biomedical Sciences at the University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY, USA. LKayler@ecmc.edu.
University at Buffalo, State University of New York · USErie County Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCompleting pre-transplant evaluation is often a barrier to kidney waiting list placement among African American (AA) patients. Interventions are needed to provide AAs with culturally sensitive, understandable information that increases their capacity to achieve placement on the kidney transplant waiting list. Research about enabling and constraining factors for patients to complete the waitlisting process is necessary to inform such interventions; however, few such studies have been conducted specific to AA patient needs.

methodsSemistructured qualitative focus groups and interviews were conducted with 24 AA listed or transplanted patients (along with their caregivers when available) and 14 transplant providers to explore thoughts, feelings, and assumptions about transplant evaluation. Questions also probed participants' perceptions of enabling and constraining factors to wait-listing. Interviews were recorded and transcribed and inductive thematic analysis was performed to inform message content for a future educational video intervention.

resultsThree themes emerged from thematic content analysis: (1) transplant center support in navigating steps to wait-listing, (2) provider attitude and messaging, and (3) education about evaluation and the waiting list. Enabling factors for evaluation completion included staff assistance with completing testing, frequent communication, and positive staff messaging. Constraining factors were staff inaccessibility, patient scheduling difficulties, and misunderstanding/misinformation regarding the role of the transplant coordinator, process of and requirements for listing, and understanding allocation.

conclusionsWe identified information based on patients' expressed needs and experiences managing evaluation completion. These findings are valuable in efforts going forward to empower AAs to achieve placement on the waiting list.

Indexed as

Kidney TransplantationWaiting ListsAdultAgedBlack or African AmericanFemaleFocus GroupsHealth PersonnelHealth Services Needs and DemandHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchCultural sensitivityHealth literacyKidney transplant accessWaiting list

Identifiers

PMID31020606
OpenAlexW2941799528

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.